Pech Laurent, Wachowiec Patryk, Mazur Dariusz
Middlesex University School of Law, London, UK.
Civil Development Forum (FOR Foundation), Warsaw, Poland.
Hague J Rule Law. 2021;13(1):1-43. doi: 10.1007/s40803-021-00151-9. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
To reinstate what amounts to a "Soviet-style justice system", Polish authorities have repeatedly and deliberately violated the Polish Constitution and EU law. Rather than comprehensively detailing these repeated violations, this article focuses on the EU dimension of Poland's rule of law breakdown. Using the activation of the Rule of Law Framework by the European Commission on 13 January 2016 as a starting point, this article offers a critical five-year assessment of EU's (in)action starting with an overview of the extent to which virtually all of the multiple problematical issues identified early on by the Commission have yet to be addressed by Polish authorities by January 2021. Regarding the Commission and the Council's (in)action, this article argues that the Commission has systematically acted in a too little too late fashion while the Council has systematically failed to meaningfully act, with the inaction of these two EU institutions amounting, at times, to dereliction of duties. By contrast, the Court of Justice has forcefully defended judicial independence whenever an infringement case was lodged with it by the Commission. The Court of Justice's record in preliminary ruling cases is more mixed due, in part, to the Court's apprehension to undermine the principle of mutual trust. The article ends with a list of key lessons and recommendations which reflect the EU's few successes and many failures highlighted in this article. It is submitted inter alia that more statements, dialogue and reports are not going to help contain, let alone solve Poland's rule of law crisis. It is indeed no longer a crisis the EU is facing but a total breakdown in the rule of law in Poland which, in turn, represents a threat to the interconnected legal order that underpins the EU.
为恢复相当于“苏联式司法系统”的体制,波兰当局屡次蓄意违反波兰宪法和欧盟法律。本文并非全面详述这些屡见不鲜的违法行为,而是聚焦于波兰法治崩溃在欧盟层面的问题。以欧盟委员会于2016年1月13日启动法治框架为起点,本文对欧盟在这五年间的(未)采取行动进行批判性评估,首先概述截至2021年1月,波兰当局几乎仍未解决欧盟委员会早期发现的所有诸多问题。关于欧盟委员会和欧盟理事会的(未)采取行动,本文认为,欧盟委员会的行动往往是太少且太迟,而欧盟理事会则系统性地未能切实采取行动,这两个欧盟机构的不作为有时等同于失职。相比之下,每当欧盟委员会向其提起侵权诉讼时,欧洲法院都有力地捍卫了司法独立。欧洲法院在初步裁决案件中的记录则更为复杂,部分原因是法院担心破坏相互信任原则。本文最后列出了一系列关键经验教训和建议,反映了本文所强调的欧盟的少数成功之处和诸多失败之处。特别需要指出的是,更多的声明、对话和报告无助于遏制,更不用说解决波兰的法治危机。事实上,欧盟面临的已不再是一场危机,而是波兰法治的全面崩溃,这反过来又对支撑欧盟的相互关联的法律秩序构成威胁。