Merrill Samuel A, Yu Stephen, Webber Sylvia E, Gotses John, Platt Emma L, Arays Ruta, Shmookler Aaron D
Department of Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Department of Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325417. eCollection 2025.
Providing optimal care for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is challenging because of multiple involved specialties, knowledge gaps, and a high rate of disease relapse. A thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) Team and TTP Pathway could improve outcomes.
To assess if a structured TTP Pathway, supported by a TMA Team, improved TTP care by reducing TTP relapse and TTP-related death (TTP-RRD) at a rural Appalachian medical center.
Prospective cohort quality improvement project using the DMAIC quality improvement framework (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) to develop a TMA Team and TTP Pathway. Pathway care included standardized use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), rituximab, caplacizumab, as well as improved coordination between medical services, and regular outpatient biochemical TTP surveillance. Outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review for patients with acute TTP treated with usual care (N = 16 episodes) and the TTP Pathway (N = 16 episodes).
All patients had acquired TTP. TTP-RRD at 90 days was reduced from 69% with usual care to 6% with Pathway care (95% CI 0.35 to 0.90, P = 0.0004), a relative risk reduction of 91%; TTP relapse alone at 90 days was reduced from 62% to 0% (95% CI 0.36 to 0.88, P = 0.0002) with Pathway care. The number needed to treat to prevent TTP-RRD was 1.59 at 90 days. Over the project duration usual care demonstrated a hazard ratio for TTP-RRD of 12.58 compared to Pathway care. With the intervention, the duration of TPE was increased (median 6 vs 12 sessions, P < 0.05), as was use of rituximab (31.3% vs 93.8%, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.88, P = 0.003), and caplacizumab (6.3% vs 62.5%, 95% CI -0.027 to -0.81, P = 0.001). All Pathway patients underwent biochemical surveillance, and 31% had pre-emptive rituximab to reduce possibility of clinical relapse. A structured TTP Pathway significantly reduces morbidity and aligns care with modern clinical guidelines. The TMA Team is a valuable institutional resource to improve outcomes.
由于涉及多个专业领域、存在知识空白以及疾病复发率高,为血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)患者提供最佳护理具有挑战性。血栓性微血管病(TMA)团队和TTP治疗路径可能会改善治疗结果。
评估在阿巴拉契亚农村医疗中心,由TMA团队支持的结构化TTP治疗路径是否通过降低TTP复发率和TTP相关死亡率(TTP-RRD)来改善TTP护理。
采用DMAIC质量改进框架(定义、测量、分析、改进、控制)开展前瞻性队列质量改进项目,以建立TMA团队和TTP治疗路径。治疗路径护理包括标准化使用治疗性血浆置换(TPE)、利妥昔单抗、卡泊单抗,以及改善医疗服务之间的协调,并定期进行门诊生化TTP监测。通过回顾性病历审查确定接受常规护理(N = 16例次)和TTP治疗路径(N = 16例次)的急性TTP患者的治疗结果。
所有患者均为获得性TTP。90天时的TTP-RRD从常规护理的69%降至治疗路径护理的6%(95%CI 0.35至0.90,P = 0.0004),相对风险降低91%;90天时仅TTP复发率从62%降至0%(95%CI 0.36至0.88,P = 0.0002)。90天时预防TTP-RRD所需治疗人数为1.59。在项目期间,常规护理显示TTP-RRD的风险比为12.58,而治疗路径护理为1。通过干预,TPE的持续时间增加(中位数6次对12次,P < 0.05),利妥昔单抗的使用也增加(31.3%对93.8%,95%CI -0.36至-0.88,P = 0.003),卡泊单抗的使用也增加(6.3%对62.5%,95%CI -0.027至-0.81,P = 0.001)。所有治疗路径患者均接受生化监测,31%的患者接受了预防性利妥昔单抗治疗以降低临床复发的可能性。结构化的TTP治疗路径显著降低了发病率,并使护理符合现代临床指南。TMA团队是改善治疗结果的宝贵机构资源。