Fujisaki Toshiya, Miyauchi Eisaku, Kida Gen, Miura Yu, Watanabe Kana, Ashinuma Hironori, Tamiya Motohiro, Kikuchi Hajime, Arai Daisuke, Takahashi Satoshi, Masuda Ken, Takigami Ayako, Nagai Yoshiaki, Miyawaki Taichi, Tsubata Yukari, Nakao Akira, Masubuchi Ken, Nishiyama Kazuhiro, Watanabe Satoshi, Morita Satoshi, Maemondo Makoto
Division of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tachikawa Medical Center Tachikawa General Hospital, Niigata, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Lung Cancer. 2025 Jul;205:108597. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108597. Epub 2025 May 27.
In locally advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the efficacy and safety of durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remain controversial.
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed treatment outcomes in patients with unresectable stage III sensitizing EGFR-mutant NSCLC who underwent and completed CCRT without progression between July 2015 and June 2022 from 48 institutions in Japan. Patients with confirmed EGFR mutations after recurrence were excluded. Comparisons between groups were conducted using a cohort extracted through propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and safety of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) after durvalumab treatment.
Out of 162 eligible patients, 106 received consolidation durvalumab following CCRT and 56 did not. After PSM, 56 patients were matched to the durvalumab and CCRT alone groups. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients treated with durvalumab than in those treated with CCRT alone (26.8 months [95 % confidence interval [CI], 13.9-NA] vs. 11.1 months [95 % CI, 9.0-18.2]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95 % CI, 0.33-0.83]; p = 0.005). While early osimertinib administration following durvalumab tended to increase Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis, there was no significant difference in the frequency of CTCAE grade ≥ 3 adverse events with EGFR-TKIs between the groups (23.5 % vs. 20.8 %).
Durvalumab administration following CCRT prolongs PFS in patients with locally advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Durvalumab can be safely administered if the timing of subsequent osimertinib is carefully managed.
在局部晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,同步放化疗(CCRT)后使用度伐利尤单抗的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2015年7月至2022年6月期间来自日本48家机构的不可切除的III期敏感EGFR突变NSCLC患者,这些患者接受并完成了CCRT且无疾病进展。复发后确诊为EGFR突变的患者被排除。使用通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)提取的队列进行组间比较。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结局是总生存期(OS)以及度伐利尤单抗治疗后EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的安全性。
162例符合条件的患者中,106例在CCRT后接受了度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗,56例未接受。PSM后,56例患者被匹配到度伐利尤单抗组和单纯CCRT组。接受度伐利尤单抗治疗的患者的中位PFS显著长于单纯接受CCRT治疗的患者(26.8个月[95%置信区间(CI),13.9 - 无上限]对11.1个月[95% CI,9.0 - 18.2];风险比[HR],0.52[95% CI,0.33 - 0.83];p = 0.005)。虽然度伐利尤单抗后早期使用奥希替尼倾向于增加不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)≥3级肺炎的发生率,但两组之间EGFR - TKIs导致的CTCAE≥3级不良事件的频率没有显著差异(23.5%对20.8%)。
CCRT后使用度伐利尤单抗可延长局部晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的PFS。如果谨慎管理后续奥希替尼的使用时机,度伐利尤单抗可以安全给药。