Suppr超能文献

非动脉粥样硬化性疾病的颈动脉支架置入术的治疗效果。

Outcomes of carotid artery stenting for nonatherosclerotic disease.

作者信息

Halabi Mouhammad, Chamseddine Hassan, Shepard Alexander, Nypaver Timothy, Weaver Mitchell, Boules Tamer, Kabbani Loay

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Sep;82(3):907-914.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.043. Epub 2025 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) in patients with nonatherosclerotic carotid diseases, including dissection, trauma, and fibromuscular dysplasia.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TCAR and tfCAS for nonatherosclerotic carotid diseases between 2016 and 2024 were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. Patients were classified into TCAR or tfCAS based on the procedure performed. Baseline characteristics, demographics, and operative details were collected. Primary outcomes included stroke, death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications. Descriptive statistics, univariable comparisons, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between procedure type and outcomes. A two-tailed P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Six hundred seventy six patients were identified (tfCAS, n = 503; TCAR, n = 173). TCAR patients were older (64 ± 14 years vs 56 ± 16 years; P < .001), and had higher rates of hypertension (74% vs 60.4%; P = .001) and coronary artery disease (34.1% vs 22.2%; P = .002). Dissection was the most common etiology (TCAR, 77.5%; tfCAS, 77.9%), followed by fibromuscular dysplasia (TCAR, 14.5%; tfCAS, 10.5%) then trauma (TCAR, 8.1%; tfCAS, 11.5%). Intraoperatively, TCAR patients had shorter fluoroscopy times (5 minutes vs 18.25 minutes; P < .001) and required less radiocontrast (30 mL vs 95 mL; P < .001), but had slightly longer procedure times (75.5 minutes vs 69 minutes; P = .055). When analyzed by procedure type, TCAR was associated with significantly lower rates of MACE (1.2% vs 7%; P = .004) and stroke/death (1.2% vs 6.4%; P = .007) compared with tfCAS. Furthermore, when stratified by symptomatic status, TCAR consistently had lower rates of MACE and stroke/death. On multivariate analysis, TCAR was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.74; P = .025) and stroke/death (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.95; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

TCAR was associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared with tfCAS in the treatment of nonatherosclerotic carotid diseases. These findings highlight TCAR's potential to be a safer and more effective treatment option for this challenging patient population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术(tfCAS)在非动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病患者中的治疗效果,这些疾病包括动脉夹层、创伤和纤维肌发育不良。

方法

在血管质量倡议(VQI)数据库中识别出2016年至2024年间因非动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病接受TCAR和tfCAS治疗的患者。根据所实施的手术将患者分为TCAR组或tfCAS组。收集基线特征、人口统计学数据和手术细节。主要结局包括卒中、死亡和主要不良心血管事件(MACE),MACE被定义为卒中、心肌梗死和死亡的综合情况。次要结局包括围手术期并发症。进行描述性统计、单变量比较和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估手术类型与结局之间的关联。双侧P值<.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共识别出676例患者(tfCAS组,n = 503;TCAR组,n = 173)。TCAR组患者年龄更大(64±14岁 vs 56±16岁;P<.001),高血压发生率更高(74% vs 60.4%;P =.001),冠状动脉疾病发生率更高(34.1% vs 22.2%;P =.002)。动脉夹层是最常见的病因(TCAR组,77.5%;tfCAS组,77.9%),其次是纤维肌发育不良(TCAR组,14.5%;tfCAS组,10.5%),然后是创伤(TCAR组,8.1%;tfCAS组,11.5%)。术中,TCAR组患者透视时间更短(5分钟 vs 18.25分钟;P<.001),所需放射造影剂更少(30 mL vs 95 mL;P<.001),但手术时间略长(75.5分钟 vs 69分钟;P =.055)。按手术类型分析时,与tfCAS相比,TCAR组的MACE发生率(1.2% vs 7%;P =.004)和卒中/死亡率(1.2% vs 6.4%;P =.007)显著更低。此外,按症状状态分层时TCAR组的MACE和卒中/死亡率始终更低。多变量分析显示,TCAR与MACE风险显著降低独立相关(比值比,0.09;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.74;P =.025)以及卒中/死亡风险显著降低独立相关(比值比,0.11;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.95;P =.045)。

结论

在治疗非动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病方面,与tfCAS相比,TCAR的围手术期结局更佳。这些发现凸显了TCAR对于这一具有挑战性的患者群体而言,有可能成为一种更安全、更有效的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验