Sium Abraham Fessehaye, Lucero-Prisno Don Eliseo
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Faculty of Management and Development Studies University of the Philippines (Open University) Los Baños Laguna Philippines.
Public Health Chall. 2024 Jun 28;3(3):e210. doi: 10.1002/puh2.210. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Providing abortion services during pandemics without interruption is essential. The objective of the study was to compare the utilization of second-trimester safe abortion care services between early pandemic and peak pandemic months.
We conducted a retrospective comparative study of second-trimester safe abortion service provision during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia (April 2021) versus during that of early pandemic (April 2020). Data were collected using data extraction form from MICHU clinic HMIS registry. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23. Chi-squared test and simple descriptive statistics were applied as appropriate. A -value of less than 0.05 was used to describe the significance of the results.
There were significantly more second-trimester abortions performed during the peak pandemic month as compared to early pandemic month (32.6% vs. 67.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the abortions were done for maternal health problems (47.8%, 44/92), and of which over 80% of them used medical methods for abortion (83.7%, 77/92). There was only one case of dilation and evacuation (D&E) during the early pandemic, compared to 14 D&E procedures during the pandemic peak.
We found a significant increment in the second-trimester abortion service coverage during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. The measures we took during the early pandemic: increasing public awareness about continuation of abortion care services during the pandemic, change in the attitude of care-providers, and early sticking to national guidelines on essential care during COVID-19 should be passed on as important lessons for future pandemics.
在大流行期间不间断地提供堕胎服务至关重要。本研究的目的是比较疫情早期和疫情高峰月份中期妊娠安全堕胎护理服务的利用情况。
我们对埃塞俄比亚新冠疫情高峰期(2021年4月)与疫情早期(2020年4月)的中期妊娠安全堕胎服务提供情况进行了回顾性比较研究。数据通过从米奇诊所医院管理信息系统登记处的数据提取表收集。使用SPSS 23版软件进行数据分析。酌情应用卡方检验和简单描述性统计。P值小于0.05用于描述结果的显著性。
与疫情早期相比,疫情高峰月份进行的中期妊娠堕胎显著更多(分别为32.6%和67.4%)。近一半的堕胎是由于孕产妇健康问题(47.8%,44/92),其中超过80%的人使用药物流产(83.7%,77/92)。疫情早期只有1例扩张刮宫术(D&E),而疫情高峰时有14例扩张刮宫术。
我们发现在新冠疫情高峰期间中期妊娠堕胎服务覆盖率显著增加。我们在疫情早期采取的措施:提高公众对疫情期间堕胎护理服务持续提供的认识、护理人员态度的转变以及在新冠疫情期间尽早坚持基本护理的国家指南,应作为未来大流行的重要经验传承下去。