He Y, Jia Q, Zhao Z Y, Yu K K, Wang Y T, Kang X Q, Wang L, Wang M X, Li C B
Department of Sports Medicine, Senior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 8;105(25):2090-2095. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241218-02872.
To compare the efficacy of the "double-strand inverted V-shape" vs the "single-strand looped" suture techniques to treat acetabular labral injuries under hip arthroscopy. In this study, clinical data of patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement admitted to the Department of Sports Medicine, Orthopedic Medicine Division, the Chinese PLA General Hospital from June 2018 to July 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into the "double-strand inverted V-shape" (double-strand) and the "single-strand looped" (single-strand) groups based on the surgical suture method for the injured labrum. The two groups were compared in terms of the labral injury extent, number and cost of anchors, and preoperative and postoperative outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, modified Harris Hip score (mHHS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores. Fifty-eight patients were included, with 30 in the double-strand group, 20 males and 10 females, aged (37.8±10.2) years, and 28 in the single-strand group, 18 males and 10 females, aged (39.3±12.6) years. All patients underwent surgery successfully, and the patients in the double-strand group and single-strand group were followed-up for [(, )] [36.0(24.0, 36.0) and 30.0(24.0, 36.0) months, respectively. The extent of labral injury 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) vs 2.0 (1.5, 2.4) h], the number of anchors [4.0 (4.0, 4.3) vs 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) pins], and the cost of the anchors [7 084 (6 916, 8 603) vs 5 061 (5 061, 6 748) yuan] in the double-strand group were all higher than those of the single-strand group (all <0.001), but the number of anchors/injury extent [1.2 (1.1, 1.3) vs. 1.5 (1.5, 2.0) pins/h] and anchor cost/injury extent[2 092 (1 949, 2 305) vs. 2 531 (2 531, 3 374) yuan/h] were lower (both <0.001). There was no statistical significance in the differences of preoperative and postoperative VAS, mHHS, and iHOT scores between the double-strand group and the single-strand group, as well as in the differences of the changes in VAS, mHHS, and iHOT scores before and after surgery (all >0.05). The "double-strand inverted V-shape" suture technique for acetabular labral injuries under hip arthroscopy can achieve clinical outcomes similar to the "single-strand looped" suture technique while reducing anchor use and costs under same injury extent, and providing better economic benefits.
比较髋关节镜下“双链倒 V 形”与“单链环形”缝合技术治疗髋臼盂唇损伤的疗效。在本研究中,回顾性收集并分析了 2018 年 6 月至 2022 年 7 月解放军总医院骨科医学部运动医学科收治的诊断为股骨髋臼撞击症患者的临床资料。根据损伤盂唇的手术缝合方法,将患者分为“双链倒 V 形”(双链)组和“单链环形”(单链)组。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛、改良 Harris 髋关节评分(mHHS)和国际髋关节疗效工具(iHOT - 12)评分,比较两组的盂唇损伤程度、锚钉数量和费用以及术前和术后结果。纳入 58 例患者,双链组 30 例,男 20 例,女 10 例,年龄(37.8±10.2)岁;单链组 28 例,男 18 例,女 10 例,年龄(39.3±12.6)岁。所有患者均成功接受手术,双链组和单链组患者分别随访[(, )] [分别为 36.0(24.0, 36.0)个月和 30.0(24.0, 36.0)个月]。双链组的盂唇损伤程度[3.5(3.0, 4.0) vs 2.0(1.5, 2.4) h]、锚钉数量[4.0(4.0, 4.3) vs 3.0(3.0, 4.0)枚]和锚钉费用[7 084(6 916, 8 603) vs 5 061(5 061, 6 748)元]均高于单链组(均<0.001),但锚钉数量/损伤程度[1.2(1.1, 1.3) vs. 1.5(1.5, 2.0)枚/h]和锚钉费用/损伤程度[2 092(1 949, 2 305) vs. 2 531(2 531, 3 374)元/h]较低(均<0.001)。双链组和单链组术前和术后 VAS、mHHS 和 iHOT 评分的差异以及手术前后 VAS、mHHS 和 iHOT 评分变化的差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。髋关节镜下髋臼盂唇损伤的“双链倒 V 形”缝合技术在相同损伤程度下可获得与“单链环形”缝合技术相似的临床效果,同时减少锚钉使用和费用,具有更好的经济效益。