Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌手术中无阿片类药物麻醉与阿片类药物平衡麻醉的随机对照研究

Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid-Balanced Anesthesia in Breast Surgeries: A Randomized Study.

作者信息

Pratyusha A Chaitanya, Ch Rama Krishna Prasad, Garre Sandeep, Sangineni Kalyani, Ayya Syama Sundar, Salian Sushmita, Ram Bhargav

机构信息

Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 May 13;17(5):e84034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84034. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

Introduction Opioids, the conventional analgesics, have adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) protocols are now being formulated to provide equally efficacious analgesia with reduced adverse effects as opioid-balanced anesthesia (OBA). The primary objective was to compare the Quality of Recovery score (QoR-15 score) and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters between OFA and OBA. The secondary objectives were to compare the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, and adverse effects. Methodology Forty-eight patients undergoing breast surgery were randomly allocated to either the OFA or OBA group. A thoracic paravertebral block with 0.2% ropivacaine, followed by general anesthesia without opioids, was used in the OFA group. A transdermal fentanyl patch was applied 10 hours before induction of general anesthesia in the OBA group. QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, VAS score for 48 hours, and adverse events were noted. Data was represented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Results The median (IQR) QoR-15 score was 130 (128-132.75) in the OBA group and 132.5 (132-135) in the OFA group (p = 0.054) at 24 hours and 142 (141-145) in the OBA group vs 145 in the OFA group (140.25-146) (p = 0.367) at 48 hours. QoR-15 in the OFA group had a higher median (IQR) for physical independence, 17.5 (16-18), against 16 (16-17) in the OBA group, with a p-value of 0.016. Four patients in the OBA group had PONV and none in the OFA group (p = 0.037). The comparison of VAS scores and hemodynamic parameters at all the time points was insignificant. Conclusion OFA is similar to OBA, considering the overall quality of recovery according to the QoR-15 score, postoperative analgesia, and intraoperative hemodynamic stability with decreased incidence of PONV.

摘要

引言 阿片类药物作为传统镇痛药,会产生诸如术后恶心呕吐(PONV)等不良反应。目前正在制定无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)方案,以提供与阿片类药物平衡麻醉(OBA)同样有效的镇痛效果,同时减少不良反应。主要目的是比较OFA和OBA之间的恢复质量评分(QoR - 15评分)和术中血流动力学参数。次要目的是比较视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、需要补救镇痛的患者数量和不良反应。

方法 48例接受乳腺手术的患者被随机分配至OFA组或OBA组。OFA组采用0.2%罗哌卡因进行胸椎旁神经阻滞,随后进行无阿片类药物的全身麻醉。OBA组在全身麻醉诱导前10小时应用透皮芬太尼贴剂。记录术后24小时和48小时的QoR - 15评分、术中血流动力学参数、48小时的VAS评分以及不良事件。数据以中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)表示。连续变量采用Mann - Whitney检验,分类变量采用Fisher精确检验。

结果 术后24小时,OBA组的QoR - 15评分中位数(IQR)为130(128 - 132.75),OFA组为132.5(132 - 135)(p = 0.054);术后48小时,OBA组为142(141 - 145),OFA组为145(140.25 - 146)(p = 0.367)。OFA组在身体独立性方面的QoR - 15评分中位数(IQR)较高,为17.5(16 - 18),而OBA组为16(16 - 17),p值为0.016。OBA组有4例患者发生PONV,OFA组无患者发生(p = 0.037)。所有时间点的VAS评分和血流动力学参数比较均无显著差异。

结论 从根据QoR - 15评分得出的总体恢复质量、术后镇痛以及术中血流动力学稳定性来看,OFA与OBA相似,且PONV发生率降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad37/12161483/af00d2ed8e36/cureus-0017-00000084034-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验