Bae Jung Hoon, Song Jumyung, Kim Ji Hoon, Kye Bong-Hyeon, Lee In Kyu, Cho Hyeon-Min, Lee Yoon Suk
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 56, Dongsuro, Bupyung-gu, Incheon, 21431, Republic of Korea.
Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;61:102249. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102249. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
Response to preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is an important indicator of the possibility of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis. However, the effect of LPN dissection (LPND) in good responders to CRT remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the optimal treatment strategy for patients with rectal cancer who respond well to preoperative CRT.
This multi-institutional retrospective study evaluated patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and clinically suspected LPN metastases who underwent total mesorectal excision with LPND after CRT. The patients were divided into two groups based on the largest lymph node diameter post-CRT (cutoff: 5 mm): good (n = 38) and poor responders (n = 53).
LPN metastasis was significantly higher in poor responders (18 patients, 34.0 %) than in good responders (5 patients, 13.2 %) (p = 0.024). All 5 patients in the good responder group had low rectal cancer (i.e., tumors located within 5 cm from the anal verge (AV)). Low rectal cancer was the only significant predictor for LPN metastasis in good responders (p = 0.004). However, LPN size before and after CRT did not predict LPN metastasis in this group (p = 0.947 and 0.910, respectively). When LPND was indicated for all poor responders and for good responders with tumors located ≤5 cm from the AV, the sensitivity for LPN metastasis diagnosis was 100 %.
Among rectal cancer patients with good response to preoperative CRT, pathological LPN metastasis occurs in 13.2 %, and tumor height is a significant risk factor for LPN metastasis. LPND might be considered for low rectal tumors, regardless of preoperative CRT response.
术前放化疗(CRT)的反应是盆腔侧方淋巴结(LPN)转移可能性的重要指标。然而,CRT反应良好者行LPN清扫术(LPND)的效果仍不明确。本研究旨在确定术前CRT反应良好的直肠癌患者的最佳治疗策略。
这项多机构回顾性研究评估了局部晚期直肠癌且临床怀疑有LPN转移、在CRT后接受全直肠系膜切除术及LPND的患者。根据CRT后最大淋巴结直径(临界值:5mm)将患者分为两组:反应良好组(n = 38)和反应不佳组(n = 53)。
反应不佳组的LPN转移率(18例患者,34.0%)显著高于反应良好组(5例患者,13.2%)(p = 0.024)。反应良好组的所有5例患者均为低位直肠癌(即肿瘤位于距肛缘(AV)5cm以内)。低位直肠癌是反应良好者LPN转移的唯一显著预测因素(p = 0.004)。然而,CRT前后的LPN大小在该组中均不能预测LPN转移(分别为p = 0.947和0.910)。当对所有反应不佳者以及肿瘤距AV≤5cm的反应良好者行LPND时,LPN转移诊断的敏感性为100%。
术前CRT反应良好的直肠癌患者中,病理性LPN转移发生率为13.2%,肿瘤高度是LPN转移的显著危险因素。无论术前CRT反应如何,对于低位直肠肿瘤可考虑行LPND。