Reid Rachel R, Dawson Neal, Duncan Eleanor, Gillespie Robert, Mitchell Christopher, Branston Claire J, Capilla-Lasheras Pablo, Boonekamp Jelle, Dominoni Davide M
School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Front Physiol. 2025 May 30;16:1592407. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1592407. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND: Artificial light at night (ALAN) continues to increase at an unprecedented rate globally every year. ALAN can disrupt circadian rhythms and cause behavioural and physiological changes which may have knock on effects for health, yet we still understand very little about these effects. It is becoming increasingly important to investigate potential mitigation strategies, through understanding what aspects of ALAN negatively impact wildlife health. METHODS: Here we present the results of an experiment where we investigated the impact of ALAN on various health biomarkers in 44 captive adult zebra finches over the course of 4 months. The health biomarkers measured included glucose concentration, change in relative telomere length, malondialdehyde, and antioxidant capacity of plasma. The birds were separated into three treatment groups consisting of 13-16 individuals and were either exposed to full light at night, partial light at night or darkness (control). RESULTS: We show that exposure to full light at night impacted the circadian pattern of glucose levels, with glucose concentrations remaining elevated later into the night compared to the control group. Full light at night also accelerated telomere shortening. However, the relationship between telomere length and treatment only became significant when the partial light at night treatment group was removed and should therefore be interpreted with caution. These effects were not observed under partial light at night. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that partial night lighting may mitigate some of ALAN's negative impacts on wildlife health. This approach could be a valuable tool in future strategies to reduce the ecological effects of light pollution in urban environments and should be investigated further.
背景:每年全球夜间人造光(ALAN)持续以前所未有的速度增加。夜间人造光会扰乱昼夜节律,导致行为和生理变化,这可能对健康产生连锁反应,但我们对这些影响仍知之甚少。通过了解夜间人造光的哪些方面会对野生动物健康产生负面影响来研究潜在的缓解策略变得越来越重要。 方法:在此我们展示一项实验的结果,在4个月的时间里,我们研究了夜间人造光对44只圈养成年斑马雀各种健康生物标志物的影响。所测量的健康生物标志物包括葡萄糖浓度、相对端粒长度的变化、丙二醛和血浆抗氧化能力。这些鸟被分成三个处理组,每组有13 - 16只个体,分别暴露于夜间全光照、夜间部分光照或黑暗环境(对照组)。 结果:我们发现,夜间暴露于全光照会影响葡萄糖水平的昼夜模式,与对照组相比,夜间后期葡萄糖浓度仍居高不下。夜间全光照还加速了端粒缩短。然而,仅在去除夜间部分光照处理组后,端粒长度与处理之间的关系才变得显著,因此对此应谨慎解读。在夜间部分光照条件下未观察到这些影响。 结论:我们的研究结果表明,部分夜间照明可能减轻夜间人造光对野生动物健康的一些负面影响。这种方法可能是未来减少城市环境光污染生态影响策略中的一个有价值的工具,应进一步研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2024-10-10
J Exp Biol. 2025-2-15
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2025-1
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024-3-25
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023-12-18
Int J Mol Sci. 2022-11-17