• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匹配和不匹配的耳鼻喉科住院医师申请人的语言分析

Language Analysis of Matched and Unmatched Otolaryngology Residency Applicants.

作者信息

Hamdi Osama A, Hirsch Scott D, Jamil Taylor L, Samarah Hani, Johnson Andrew P, Cabrera-Muffly Cristina

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 14;10(3):e70170. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70170. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.70170
PMID:40521133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166312/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The otolaryngology residency match process is highly competitive. This study evaluated demographic, academic, and linguistic differences in personal statements (PSs) and letters of recommendation (LORs) between matched and unmatched applicants.

METHODS

A retrospective quantitative analysis of 2130 residency applicants to one institution during the 2015-2021 match cycles was conducted. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2022 (LIWC2022), a validated software tool, was used to analyze emotional, cognitive, and structural components of written text.

RESULTS

Among 2130 applicants, 1671 (78.5%) matched. Non-Hispanic White applicants had significantly higher match rates compared to non-white applicants ( = 0.001). Matched applicants demonstrated superior academic performance, including higher USMLE Step 1 scores (247 ± 12.2 vs. 239.2 ± 16.1,  < 0.001), Step 2 CS pass rates (99.2% vs. 95.8%,  < 0.001), and greater research productivity. Linguistic analysis revealed that matched applicants used more analytical (OR = 1.02,  < 0.001), clout (OR = 1.01,  = 0.007), and positive tone (OR = 1.16,  = 0.003) language in PSs. Unmatched applicants used more negative tone (OR = 0.619,  < 0.001) and negative emotion (OR = 0.54,  = 0.001). LORs for matched applicants exhibited less negative tone (OR = 0.35,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Matched applicants displayed stronger academic metrics and cognitive language patterns in PSs, highlighting an emphasis on analytical writing over emotional expression. LOR language differed between groups, revealing linguistic features predictive of matching success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

耳鼻喉科住院医师匹配过程竞争激烈。本研究评估了匹配和未匹配申请人在个人陈述(PS)和推荐信(LOR)中的人口统计学、学术和语言差异。

方法

对2015 - 2021年匹配周期内一所机构的2130名住院医师申请人进行回顾性定量分析。使用经过验证的软件工具语言查询与字数统计2022(LIWC2022)来分析书面文本的情感、认知和结构成分。

结果

在2130名申请人中,1671人(78.5%)匹配成功。非西班牙裔白人申请人的匹配率显著高于非白人申请人(P = 0.001)。匹配成功的申请人表现出更优异的学术成绩,包括更高的美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)分数(247 ± 12.2 vs. 239.2 ± 16.1,P < 0.001)、第二步临床技能(Step 2 CS)通过率(99.2% vs. 95.8%,P < 0.001)以及更高的研究产出。语言分析显示,匹配成功的申请人在个人陈述中使用了更多的分析性语言(OR = 1.02,P < 0.001)、影响力语言(OR = 1.01,P = 0.007)和积极语气语言(OR = 1.16,P = 0.003)。未匹配成功的申请人使用了更多的消极语气语言(OR = 0.619,P < 0.001)和消极情绪语言(OR = 0.54,P = 0.001)。匹配成功申请人的推荐信表现出较少的消极语气(OR = 0.35,P < 0.001)。

结论

匹配成功的申请人在个人陈述中展现出更强的学术指标和认知语言模式,突出了对分析性写作而非情感表达的重视。不同组之间推荐信的语言存在差异,揭示了预测匹配成功的语言特征。

证据水平

三级。

相似文献

1
Language Analysis of Matched and Unmatched Otolaryngology Residency Applicants.匹配和不匹配的耳鼻喉科住院医师申请人的语言分析
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jun 14;10(3):e70170. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70170. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Racial and Ethnic Bias in Letters of Recommendation and Personal Statements for Application to Otolaryngology Residency.种族和民族偏见在耳鼻喉科住院医师申请推荐信和个人陈述中的体现
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(3):141-149. doi: 10.1159/000529795. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Sex bias in letters of recommendation and personal statements for otolaryngology residency.耳鼻喉科住院医师推荐信和个人陈述中的性别偏见。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Oct 3;7(6):1745-1750. doi: 10.1002/lio2.932. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Don't Judge a Letter by its Title: Linguistic Analysis of Letters of Recommendation by Author's Academic Rank.勿以题书名:基于作者学术地位的推荐信的语言学分析
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship Applicants.母胎医学专科住院医师申请推荐信中的性别语言差异
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1955-e1961. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770148. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
A Linguistic Analysis of United States Navy Orthopaedic Surgery Applicant Personal Statements.美国海军骨科手术申请人个人陈述的语言分析。
Mil Med. 2024 Nov 5;189(11-12):e2673-e2677. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae190.
7
Differences in the Academic Attributes of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants are Narrowing.匹配和未匹配的骨科手术住院医师申请人在学术属性上的差异正在缩小。
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 13;8(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00138. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
8
Letters of recommendation for gynecologic oncology fellowship differ by gender and race.妇科肿瘤学 fellowship 的推荐信因性别和种族而异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Oct;177:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
9
Gender-Based Differences in Urology Residency Applicant Personal Statements.泌尿科住院医师申请人个人陈述中的性别差异。
Urology. 2021 Apr;150:2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.066. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Linguistic Differences in Personal Statements of Urology Residency Applicants by Self-Reported Race and Ethnicity.根据自我报告的种族和民族,泌尿外科住院医师申请人个人陈述中的语言差异。
Urology. 2022 Apr;162:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends of Rising Research Production Among Otolaryngology Residency Applicants.耳鼻咽喉科住院医师申请人研究产出上升趋势。
OTO Open. 2024 Jul 15;8(3):e170. doi: 10.1002/oto2.170. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Importance of residency applicant factors based on specialty and demographics: a national survey of program directors.基于专业和人口统计学的住院医师申请人因素的重要性:一项针对项目主任的全国性调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05267-8.
3
A Comparison of Otolaryngology Residency Applicants Over Time and to Other Surgical Applicants.耳鼻喉科住院医师申请人随时间变化的情况以及与其他外科申请人的比较。
OTO Open. 2024 Feb 22;8(1):e115. doi: 10.1002/oto2.115. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
4
Ten Steps for Writing an Exceptional Personal Statement.撰写出色个人陈述的十个步骤。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):522-525. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00331.1.
5
Creating a high-quality personal statement for residency application: A guide for medical students and mentors.为住院医师申请撰写高质量个人陈述:医学生及导师指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Sep 9;6(5):e10797. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10797. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
A Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors: Perspectives following USMLE Step 1 Conversion to Pass/Fail and Virtual Only Interviews.血管外科项目主任调查:美国医师执照考试第一步改为及格/不及格以及仅采用虚拟面试后的观点。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
7
Making the Personal Statement "Truly Personal": Recommendations From a Qualitative Case Study of Internal Medicine Program and Associate Program Directors.使个人陈述“真正个性化”:内科项目和副主任项目主任的定性案例研究的建议。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Apr;14(2):210-217. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00849.1. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
Otolaryngology residency selection: are we doing it right?耳鼻喉科学住院医师选拔:我们做对了吗?
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Dec 1;29(6):517-525. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000760.
9
Residency Program Director Perspectives on Changes to US Medical Licensing Examination.住院医师培训项目主任对美国医师执照考试改革的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2129557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29557.
10
Perceived Impact of USMLE Step 1 Score Reporting to Pass/Fail on Otolaryngology Applicant Selection.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步成绩报告为通过/不通过对耳鼻喉科申请人选择的影响的感知。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022 May;131(5):506-511. doi: 10.1177/00034894211028436. Epub 2021 Jul 1.