• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历实施前后急诊护理管理计划的绩效评估

Performance Review of Emergency Care Management Plans Pre- and Post-Implementation of Electronic Records.

作者信息

Yeak Daryl, Osman Abdi D, MacGibbon Paul, Van Der End Amy, Mansouri Negar, Matarazzo Michelle, Braitberg George

机构信息

Emergency Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

College of Sports, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, St Albans, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Jun;37(3):e70083. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70083.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.70083
PMID:40525596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12172138/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients who frequently present to the Emergency Department (ED) often have complex care needs, requiring substantial resources and resulting in longer stays. Emergency Care Management Plans (ECMPs) are designed to help clinicians adopt a person-centred approach, clarify goals, avoid unnecessary interventions, and reduce ED visit frequency and duration. ECMPs at our institution were previously stored in paper medical records, making timely access difficult. On April 2, 2012, ECMPs were scanned into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), allowing easier access. This study assesses the impact of electronic ECMPs.

METHODS

Using a retrospective observational design guided by the STROBE checklist, we evaluated whether the introduction of electronic ECMPs reduced the frequency and duration of ED visits. Data from all ED patients with electronic ECMPs were extracted and analysed to compare variables pre- and post-implementation, including demographics, most common triage data, visit frequency, length of stay (LOS), and discharge diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients (mean age: 53) were included. Ambulance transport was the most common (64%), and Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) category 3 was the most frequent (57%). Post implementation the mean number of presentations reduced from 16 to 9, and ED LOS (EDLOS) decreased from 4676 to 2577 min (p < 0.001). Short Stay Unit LOS (SSULOS) decreased from 1359 to 638 min (p < 0.001), leading to an overall reduction of 2802 min (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ECMPs effectively reduced both the frequency and duration of ED visits. Further research is needed to explore patient experience and other outcome measures.

摘要

引言

经常前往急诊科(ED)就诊的患者通常有复杂的护理需求,需要大量资源,导致住院时间延长。急诊护理管理计划(ECMPs)旨在帮助临床医生采用以患者为中心的方法,明确目标,避免不必要的干预,并减少急诊科就诊频率和时长。我们机构的急诊护理管理计划以前存储在纸质病历中,难以及时获取。2012年4月2日,急诊护理管理计划被扫描到电子病历(EMR)中,便于更轻松地获取。本研究评估了电子急诊护理管理计划的影响。

方法

采用由STROBE清单指导的回顾性观察设计,我们评估了引入电子急诊护理管理计划是否降低了急诊科就诊的频率和时长。提取并分析了所有有电子急诊护理管理计划的急诊科患者的数据,以比较实施前后的变量,包括人口统计学、最常见的分诊数据、就诊频率、住院时长(LOS)和出院诊断。

结果

共纳入115名患者(平均年龄:53岁)。救护车运送是最常见的方式(64%),澳大利亚分诊量表(ATS)3级是最常见的级别(57%)。实施后,就诊的平均次数从16次减少到9次,急诊科住院时长(EDLOS)从4676分钟降至2577分钟(p < 0.001)。短期住院病房住院时长(SSULOS)从1359分钟降至638分钟(p < 0.001),总体减少了2802分钟(p < 0.001)。

结论

急诊护理管理计划有效降低了急诊科就诊的频率和时长。需要进一步研究以探索患者体验和其他结果指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/3cd81c247abc/EMM-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/35513a59187d/EMM-37-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/56363906f106/EMM-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/f04ad6511a98/EMM-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/3cd81c247abc/EMM-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/35513a59187d/EMM-37-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/56363906f106/EMM-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/f04ad6511a98/EMM-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c00/12172138/3cd81c247abc/EMM-37-0-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance Review of Emergency Care Management Plans Pre- and Post-Implementation of Electronic Records.电子病历实施前后急诊护理管理计划的绩效评估
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Jun;37(3):e70083. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70083.
2
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
3
Multifaceted behavioral interventions to improve topical glaucoma therapy adherence in adults.多方面行为干预以提高成人局部青光眼治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD015788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015788.pub2.
4
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
5
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
6
Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.药物和电子烟干预成人戒烟的效果:成分网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):CD015226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015226.pub2.
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
8
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Advanced Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对患有晚期疾病的老年人在急诊科进行的重病谈话:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16582.
10
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Events in Emergency Department Boarding: A Systematic Review.急诊科留观患者的不良事件:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 Jul;53(4):458-467. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12653. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
An evaluation of the use of management care plans for people who frequently attend the emergency department.对频繁前往急诊科的患者使用管理式护理计划的评估。
Australas Emerg Care. 2019 Dec;22(4):229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
Individual predictors of frequent emergency department use: a scoping review.
频繁使用急诊科的个体预测因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1852-1.
4
The Efficacy of Case Management on Emergency Department Frequent Users: An Eight-Year Observational Study.病例管理对急诊科频繁使用者的疗效:一项为期八年的观察性研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
5
Effectiveness of case management strategies in reducing emergency department visits in frequent user patient populations: a systematic review.病例管理策略在减少频繁就诊患者群体急诊就诊次数方面的有效性:一项系统评价
J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):717-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.035. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Use of health information technology to manage frequently presenting emergency department patients.利用健康信息技术管理经常就诊的急诊科患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;11(4):348-53.