Johnson Dana M, Ramaswamy Sruthi, Gomperts Rebecca
Research Fellow, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Undergraduate Student, McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2522567. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2522567. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
The WHO recommends two medication abortion regimens, either misoprostol used with mifepristone or misoprostol-only. Both regimens are recognised as safe and effective, but in the United States (US) most abortions are completed using mifepristone and misoprostol. Given current political hostility to abortion, restrictions on mifepristone, and the long-term legal strategy to restrict nationwide access to the combined mifepristone and misoprostol regimen, more people in the US may use misoprostol-only regimens. Globally research has documented experiences with misoprostol-only abortions, but what are the experiences among people living in the US? We conducted a thematic analysis of 31 in-depth interviews with people who self-managed their abortion using misoprostol acquired from a mail-order or retail pharmacy between May and June 2020. We examine the acceptability of using misoprostol for medication abortion across three domains: the medication regimen, the mode of delivery of medications, and the overall model of care. We find that individual perceptions of misoprostol were shaped by both prior and informed knowledge. Picking up misoprostol from a retail pharmacy fostered familiarity, and having a prescription legitimised the service as an authentic medication provider. Receiving medications from the mail-order delivery model met preferences for privacy and anonymity. In reflections on the overall model, satisfaction was high across participants, but those who were adolescents at the time of their abortion had a distinct unmet need for emotional support compared to older participants. These results contribute to a growing evidence base on the acceptability of misoprostol-only regimens and mail-order and retail pharmacy service delivery models.
世界卫生组织推荐了两种药物流产方案,即米索前列醇与米非司酮联合使用或仅使用米索前列醇。这两种方案都被认为是安全有效的,但在美国,大多数堕胎是通过使用米非司酮和米索前列醇完成的。鉴于当前对堕胎的政治敌意、对米非司酮的限制以及限制全国范围内使用米非司酮和米索前列醇联合方案的长期法律策略,美国可能会有更多人使用仅含米索前列醇的方案。在全球范围内,研究记录了仅使用米索前列醇进行堕胎的经历,但美国居民的经历是怎样的呢?我们对2020年5月至6月间通过邮购或零售药店自行获取米索前列醇进行堕胎的31人进行了深入访谈,并进行了主题分析。我们从药物治疗方案、药物交付方式和整体护理模式这三个方面来考察使用米索前列醇进行药物流产的可接受性。我们发现,个人对米索前列醇的认知受到既往知识和信息的影响。从零售药店取到米索前列醇会让人更熟悉,而拥有处方则使该服务作为正规药物供应方合法化。通过邮购交付模式收到药物符合对隐私和匿名性的偏好。在对整体模式的反思中,参与者的满意度普遍较高,但与年龄较大的参与者相比,那些在堕胎时为青少年的人对情感支持有着明显未被满足的需求。这些结果为仅含米索前列醇方案以及邮购和零售药店服务交付模式的可接受性提供了越来越多的证据。