利用电子健康记录数据评估协作护理模式治疗抑郁和焦虑对心血管危险因素的影响。

Impact of collaborative care model treatment for depression and anxiety on cardiovascular risk factors using electronic health record data.

作者信息

Carroll Allison J, Philbin Sarah E, Sanuade Olutobi A, Fu Emily S, Carlo Andrew D, Pedamallu Havisha, Borisuth Saneha, Rosenthal Lisa J, Rado Jeffrey T, Jordan Neil, Burnett-Zeigler Inger E, Brown C Hendricks, Smith Justin D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Health Sciences Integrated PhD Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2025 Jun 18;388:119720. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119720.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care patients with depression or anxiety are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease. Those who engage in integrated mental health treatment may also improve their cardiovascular health.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analysis of electronic health record-extracted data related to a pragmatic, implementation trial of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety (CoCM; NCT04321876). Primary care patients with elevated depressive/anxiety symptoms (N = 3252) in 11 primary care clinics were classified as CoCM Patients (n = 718), Not Referred to CoCM (n = 1348), or Not Engaged in CoCM (n = 1459). Cardiovascular health measures included blood pressure (BP; mmHg), total cholesterol (mg/dL), HbA1c (%), and body mass index (BMI; kg/m). Primary analyses were linear regressions evaluating associations of CoCM treatment (vs. Not Referred, vs. Not Engaged) with changes in cardiovascular health, adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular diagnoses, and medications.

RESULTS

At baseline, CoCM Patients had poorer cardiovascular health than Not Referred (higher systolic BP, total cholesterol, BMI) and better cardiovascular health than Not Engaged (lower total cholesterol, HbA1c). CoCM Patients, vs. Not Referred, had small decreases in total cholesterol (B = -0.44, 95 % CI: -0.72, -0.17) and increases in BMI (B = 0.18, 95 % CI: 0.03, 0.34). CoCM Patients did not differ from Not Engaged patients on cardiovascular health outcomes (all ps > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Differences in cardiovascular health profiles were evident prior to treatment. Patients who bengaged in CoCM treatment, compared to patients not referred to CoCM, evidenced small improvements in total cholesterol and increases in BMI. Widespread implementation of integrated mental health treatment may have implications for population cardiovascular health.

摘要

背景

患有抑郁症或焦虑症的初级保健患者患心血管疾病的风险更高。接受综合心理健康治疗的患者也可能改善其心血管健康状况。

方法

我们对与抑郁症和焦虑症协作护理模式(CoCM;NCT04321876)的务实实施试验相关的电子健康记录提取数据进行了二次分析。11家初级保健诊所中抑郁/焦虑症状升高的初级保健患者(N = 3252)被分类为CoCM患者(n = 718)、未转诊至CoCM组(n = 1348)或未参与CoCM组(n = 1459)。心血管健康指标包括血压(BP;mmHg)、总胆固醇(mg/dL)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c;%)和体重指数(BMI;kg/m²)。主要分析为线性回归,评估CoCM治疗(与未转诊组相比,与未参与组相比)与心血管健康变化之间的关联,并对人口统计学、心血管诊断和药物进行了调整。

结果

在基线时,CoCM患者的心血管健康状况比未转诊组差(收缩压、总胆固醇、BMI更高),比未参与组好(总胆固醇、HbA1c更低)。与未转诊组相比,CoCM患者的总胆固醇略有下降(B = -0.44,95%CI:-0.72,-0.17),BMI略有增加(B = 0.18,95%CI:0.03,0.34)。CoCM患者与未参与组在心血管健康结局方面没有差异(所有p值>0.05)。

讨论

治疗前心血管健康状况的差异很明显。与未转诊至CoCM的患者相比,接受CoCM治疗的患者总胆固醇有小幅改善,BMI有所增加。综合心理健康治疗的广泛实施可能会对人群心血管健康产生影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索