文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

老年综合评估8项指标对癌症患者的预后作用:一项荟萃分析与系统评价

The prognostic role of Geriatric 8 in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

作者信息

Chen Runzhi, Yang Dongmei, Tian Mengxing, Xu Huiting, Jin Xin

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 43000, China.

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 43000, China.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf118.


DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf118
PMID:40542587
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the association between the Geriatric 8 (G-8) geriatric screening tool and prognosis in patients with cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the G-8 score in patients with cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline databases were searched to identify trials exploring the association between G-8 score and prognosis in patients with cancer. Meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the high and low G-8 scores were performed. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies involving 9053 patients with cancer were included. The prevalence of frailty, evaluated using the G-8 tool across trials, ranged from 27% to 91%. A low G-8 score was associated with poor OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.11; 95% CI:1.93-2.31, P <.001) and PFS (HR 1.78, 95% CI,1.55-2.05, P <.001) in patients with cancer. Overall survival were shorter in patients with low G-8 scores than in those with high G-8 scores in digestive system tumors, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, gynecologic tumors, hematologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. The predictive role of the G-8 tool was also confirmed in subgroups with G-8 cutoff values of 9-14. Patients with low G-8 scores had more advanced disease stages and higher ECOG performance status scores. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of frailty was high among patients with cancer according to the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Decreased G-8 scores are significantly associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. G-8 is a promising tool for frailty screening.

摘要

目的:既往研究报告了老年8项(G-8)老年筛查工具与癌症患者预后之间的关联,但结果相互矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在评估G-8评分对癌症患者的预后价值。 方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Medline数据库,以确定探索G-8评分与癌症患者预后之间关联的试验。对高G-8评分和低G-8评分患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行荟萃分析。使用预后研究质量工具评估纳入研究的质量。 结果:共纳入42项研究,涉及9053例癌症患者。在各项试验中,使用G-8工具评估的虚弱患病率在27%至91%之间。低G-8评分与癌症患者较差的OS(风险比[HR]2.11;95%置信区间:1.93-2.31,P<0.001)和PFS(HR 1.78,95%置信区间,1.55-2.05,P<0.001)相关。在消化系统肿瘤、头颈癌、肺癌、妇科肿瘤、血液系统恶性肿瘤和前列腺癌中,G-8评分低的患者的总生存期比G-8评分高的患者短。G-8工具的预测作用在G-8临界值为9-14的亚组中也得到了证实。G-8评分低的患者疾病分期更晚,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分更高。 结论:根据G-8老年筛查工具,癌症患者中虚弱的患病率较高。G-8评分降低与癌症患者的不良生存显著相关。G-8是一种有前景的虚弱筛查工具。

相似文献

[1]
The prognostic role of Geriatric 8 in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Oncologist. 2025-6-4

[2]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[3]
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-9-13

[4]
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26

[5]
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4

[6]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

[7]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[8]
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23

[9]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[10]
First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Frailty and outcomes in adults undergoing systemic anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025-7-1

[2]
The controlling nutritional status score as a new prognostic predictor in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2024-9-3

[3]
Cancer, metastasis, and the epigenome.

Mol Cancer. 2024-8-2

[4]
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.

J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024-2-2

[5]
Skeletal Muscle Index-Based Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Nutr Rev. 2025-3-1

[6]
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2024

[7]
Associations of seven measures of biological age acceleration with frailty and all-cause mortality among adult survivors of childhood cancer in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort.

Nat Cancer. 2024-5

[8]
Evaluation of treatment outcomes and tolerability in older patients with rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy accompanied by the G-8 geriatric score: TROD13-003 multicenter study.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2024-4

[9]
Assessing frailty in older Indian patients before cancer treatment: Comparative analysis of three scales and their implications for overall survival.

J Geriatr Oncol. 2024-4

[10]
The significance of G8 and other geriatric assessments in urologic cancer management: A comprehensive review.

Int J Urol. 2024-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索