Chen Runzhi, Yang Dongmei, Tian Mengxing, Xu Huiting, Jin Xin
Department of Medical Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 43000, China.
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 43000, China.
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf118.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the association between the Geriatric 8 (G-8) geriatric screening tool and prognosis in patients with cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the G-8 score in patients with cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline databases were searched to identify trials exploring the association between G-8 score and prognosis in patients with cancer. Meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the high and low G-8 scores were performed. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies involving 9053 patients with cancer were included. The prevalence of frailty, evaluated using the G-8 tool across trials, ranged from 27% to 91%. A low G-8 score was associated with poor OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.11; 95% CI:1.93-2.31, P <.001) and PFS (HR 1.78, 95% CI,1.55-2.05, P <.001) in patients with cancer. Overall survival were shorter in patients with low G-8 scores than in those with high G-8 scores in digestive system tumors, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, gynecologic tumors, hematologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. The predictive role of the G-8 tool was also confirmed in subgroups with G-8 cutoff values of 9-14. Patients with low G-8 scores had more advanced disease stages and higher ECOG performance status scores. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of frailty was high among patients with cancer according to the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Decreased G-8 scores are significantly associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. G-8 is a promising tool for frailty screening.
目的:既往研究报告了老年8项(G-8)老年筛查工具与癌症患者预后之间的关联,但结果相互矛盾。本荟萃分析旨在评估G-8评分对癌症患者的预后价值。 方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和Medline数据库,以确定探索G-8评分与癌症患者预后之间关联的试验。对高G-8评分和低G-8评分患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行荟萃分析。使用预后研究质量工具评估纳入研究的质量。 结果:共纳入42项研究,涉及9053例癌症患者。在各项试验中,使用G-8工具评估的虚弱患病率在27%至91%之间。低G-8评分与癌症患者较差的OS(风险比[HR]2.11;95%置信区间:1.93-2.31,P<0.001)和PFS(HR 1.78,95%置信区间,1.55-2.05,P<0.001)相关。在消化系统肿瘤、头颈癌、肺癌、妇科肿瘤、血液系统恶性肿瘤和前列腺癌中,G-8评分低的患者的总生存期比G-8评分高的患者短。G-8工具的预测作用在G-8临界值为9-14的亚组中也得到了证实。G-8评分低的患者疾病分期更晚,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分更高。 结论:根据G-8老年筛查工具,癌症患者中虚弱的患病率较高。G-8评分降低与癌症患者的不良生存显著相关。G-8是一种有前景的虚弱筛查工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-4
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025-7-1
Mol Cancer. 2024-8-2
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024-2-2