V Vidyadhara, R V Ranganath, B N Varsha
Chetana Exponential Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, Karnataka State, 560,001, India.
M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru,, Karnataka State, 560,058, India.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Jun;32(26):15975-15994. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36652-5. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
Construction industry is progressively seeking sustainable approaches to reduce its environmental footprint. Due to the large volume of concrete consumption, there is extensive focus on enhancing its engineering properties without neglecting the sustainability concerns. In the present work, an attempt has been made to produce geopolymer concrete with industrial by-products. Grinding treatment was carried out to improve the reactivity of the as-received/unprocessed pond ash (UPA), and the output was ground pond ash (GPA). A combination of GPA and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in the ratio of 70:30 was used as binders in the production of geopolymer concrete (GPC). Furthermore, due to the sustainability factor, UPA was incorporated as a complete replacement for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NH) and sodium silicate (NS) were used as alkaline activators. In the GPC binder, NaO% and activator modulus (AM), i.e., SiO/NaO, play a vital role in deciding the degree of polymerization. Thus, two binder contents, namely 500 kg/m and 550 kg/m, were used. Two variations of NaO content, namely 5% and 7.5% of binder, have been included. Three AM values-1, 1.5, and 2-were used to prepare concrete samples. Compressive strength and flexural strength of GPC were evaluated. Microstructural properties using scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared radiation (FTIR), thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) have been explored in the present study. Cost and embodied energy analysis were also carried out. Strength results indicated that AM of 2 yielded high early strength due to the rapid setting caused by the reaction between GGBS and the readily available higher proportion of SiO in NS. In later stages, it was observed that the AM of 1.5 yielded higher strength because of the synergy in the reaction between GPA and GGBS in combination with alkaline solutions. Furthermore, increased NaO from 5% to 7.5% enhanced the strength by improving the dissolution of aluminosilicates from GPA and GGBS. Among all the combinations, 550, 7.5, 1 mix yielded the highest compressive strength of 42.91 MPa at 28 days. Also, the same combination 550, 7.5, 1, consumed the lowest cost of 205 INR for unit compressive strength production. The combination 500, 5, 1.5 consumed the lowest embodied energy of 40 MJ per unit compressive strength production. However, the results of the mechanical properties, cost analysis, embodied energy analysis, and microstructural studies substantiate that mix with the combination of 550, 7.5, 1 serves as an optimized blend of binder content, NaO, and AM for sustainable production of GPA and GGBS-based GPC.
建筑行业正在逐步寻求可持续的方法来减少其环境足迹。由于混凝土消耗量巨大,人们广泛关注在不忽视可持续性问题的前提下提高其工程性能。在当前工作中,已尝试利用工业副产品生产地聚合物混凝土。对原样/未处理的池塘灰(UPA)进行研磨处理以提高其反应活性,得到的产物是磨细池塘灰(GPA)。在生产地聚合物混凝土(GPC)时,将GPA和磨细粒化高炉矿渣(GGBS)按70:30的比例混合用作胶凝材料。此外,出于可持续性因素考虑,UPA被用作细集料的完全替代品。氢氧化钠(NH)和硅酸钠(NS)用作碱性激发剂。在GPC胶凝材料中,Na₂O%和激发剂模量(AM),即SiO₂/Na₂O,在决定聚合程度方面起着至关重要的作用。因此,使用了两种胶凝材料用量,即500 kg/m³和550 kg/m³。包含了两种Na₂O含量变化,即胶凝材料的5%和7.5%。使用三个AM值——1、1.5和2来制备混凝土样品。评估了GPC的抗压强度和抗弯强度。本研究探索了使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、X射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外辐射(FTIR)、热重分析(TGA)和差热分析(DTA)的微观结构特性。还进行了成本和隐含能源分析。强度结果表明,AM为2时由于GGBS与NS中易于获得的较高比例的SiO₂之间的反应导致快速凝结而产生较高的早期强度。在后期阶段,观察到AM为1.5时由于GPA与GGBS在碱性溶液中的协同反应而产生更高的强度。此外,将Na₂O从5%增加到7.5%通过改善GPA和GGBS中铝硅酸盐的溶解来提高强度。在所有组合中,550、7.5、1的组合在28天时产生了最高抗压强度42.91 MPa。同样,550、7.5、1的组合在单位抗压强度生产中消耗的成本最低,为205印度卢比。500、5、1.5的组合在单位抗压强度生产中消耗的隐含能源最低,为40 MJ。然而,力学性能、成本分析、隐含能源分析和微观结构研究的结果证实,550、7.5、1组合的混合料是基于GPA和GGBS的GPC可持续生产中胶凝材料用量、Na₂O和AM的优化组合。