Suppr超能文献

在一个多元文化记忆诊所样本中,对五种用于痴呆和轻度认知障碍的跨文化认知筛查工具的诊断准确性进行比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of five cross-cultural cognitive screening instruments for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in a multicultural memory clinic sample.

作者信息

Nielsen T Rune, Jørgensen Kasper, Delgado-Álvarez Alfonso, Franzen Sanne, Lozano-Ruiz Alvaro, Özden Maria, Palisson Juliette, Mukadam Naaheed, Waldemar Gunhild

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug;106(3):1143-1152. doi: 10.1177/13872877251351037. Epub 2025 Jun 22.

Abstract

BackgroundWith the changing demographic landscape in most countries worldwide, early identification of cognitive impairment in multicultural populations is increasingly relevant.ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC), BASIC Questionnaire (BASIC-Q), Category Cued Memory Test (CCMT), Multicultural Cognitive Examination (MCE), and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a multicultural memory clinic sample.MethodsThe study was a cross-sectional multi-center study across six sites in five European countries. All cognitive screening instruments were available in the majority languages of the collaborating countries. Participants with immigrant status were generally assessed in their first language by multilingual researchers or through interpreter-mediated assessment. Correlation analysis was used to explore associations between scores on the cognitive screening instruments. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to examine diagnostic accuracy for dementia and MCI as compared to specialist diagnosis.ResultsThe study included 187 participants (94 cognitively intact, 36 MCI, 57 dementia), of which 105 (56%) had immigrant background. All cognitive screening instruments were strongly correlated and had high diagnostic accuracy for dementia (areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) in the range 0.86-0.97) and moderate to high diagnostic accuracy for MCI (AUCs in the range 0.72-0.86), with the MCE, BASIC, and BASIC-Q showing the best diagnostic properties. Overall, diagnostic accuracy for cognitive impairment (dementia or MCI) did not significantly differ between European native-born and immigrant participants, or between participants with <7 compared to ≥7 years of formal schooling.ConclusionsIn the present study, the MCE, BASIC, and BASIC-Q showed better diagnostic properties than the RUDAS and CCMT for the diagnosis of dementia and MCI in a multicultural memory clinic sample.

摘要

背景

随着全球大多数国家人口结构的变化,在多元文化人群中早期识别认知障碍变得越来越重要。

目的

比较简易认知障碍评估(BASIC)、BASIC问卷(BASIC-Q)、类别线索记忆测试(CCMT)、多元文化认知检查(MCE)和罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)在多元文化记忆诊所样本中对痴呆和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的诊断准确性。

方法

该研究是一项在五个欧洲国家六个地点开展的横断面多中心研究。所有认知筛查工具都有合作国家的大多数语言版本。具有移民身份的参与者通常由多语言研究人员用其母语进行评估,或通过口译员介导的评估进行。相关性分析用于探索认知筛查工具得分之间的关联。与专科诊断相比,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来检验痴呆和MCI的诊断准确性。

结果

该研究纳入了187名参与者(94名认知功能正常,36名MCI,57名痴呆),其中105名(56%)有移民背景。所有认知筛查工具都高度相关,对痴呆具有较高的诊断准确性(ROC曲线下面积(AUC)在0.86 - 0.97范围内),对MCI具有中度到高度的诊断准确性(AUC在0.72 - 0.86范围内),其中MCE、BASIC和BASIC-Q表现出最佳的诊断性能。总体而言,欧洲本土出生和移民参与者之间,以及受教育年限<7年与≥7年的参与者之间,认知障碍(痴呆或MCI)的诊断准确性没有显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,对于多元文化记忆诊所样本中的痴呆和MCI诊断,MCE、BASIC和BASIC-Q比RUDAS和CCMT表现出更好的诊断性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验