Takahashi Ken, Yanaihara Nozomu, Kishi Hiroshi, Samura Osamu, Okamoto Aikou
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84575. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84575. eCollection 2025 May.
Postpartum bleeding is commonly addressed with uterine compression using absorbable sutures; however, possible complications associated with non-absorbable threads are not well documented. We present a case in which a non-absorbable thread was mistakenly used to perform uterine compression sutures to treat postpartum uterine bleeding. Non-invasive methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging and hysteroscopy, failed to assess the sutures. As the patient wanted to have another child, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed one year later; the suture thread was still present, and a gap had formed between the thread and uterus, posing a risk for intestinal obstruction. The suture thread was successfully removed, and fertility treatment was resumed. This case highlights the dangers of using a non-absorbable thread for uterine compression sutures and the importance of promptly removing these sutures to avoid complications. Simulation training and pre-prepared suture materials are essential to prevent such errors. This case highlights the clinical risks associated with the use of non-absorbable sutures for uterine compression and the necessity of prompt identification and intervention to protect reproductive health.
产后出血通常采用可吸收缝线进行子宫压迫来处理;然而,与不可吸收缝线相关的可能并发症并未得到充分记录。我们报告一例病例,其中错误地使用了不可吸收缝线进行子宫压迫缝合以治疗产后子宫出血。磁共振成像和宫腔镜检查等非侵入性方法未能评估缝线情况。由于患者希望再生育,一年后进行了诊断性腹腔镜检查;缝线仍存在,且缝线与子宫之间形成了间隙,存在肠梗阻风险。成功取出了缝线,并恢复了生育治疗。该病例凸显了使用不可吸收缝线进行子宫压迫缝合的危险性,以及及时取出这些缝线以避免并发症的重要性。模拟训练和预先准备好的缝合材料对于预防此类错误至关重要。该病例凸显了使用不可吸收缝线进行子宫压迫相关的临床风险,以及及时识别和干预以保护生殖健康必要性。