Lim Na Rae, Chung Woo Chul
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul 16247, South Korea.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):104234. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234.
The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with the intent of reducing gastric acidity to the desired therapeutic level for treating bleeding peptic ulcer still has several limitations.
To compare intravenous PPIs and oral potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs) administered prior to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.
This retrospective study involved 105 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (treated August 2023 to February 2024). Prior to emergency endoscopy, patients received either intravenous PPI (pantoprazole 80 mg bolus) or oral PCAB (tegoprazan 50 mg single-dose). Severity of bleeding was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall, and AIMS65 scoring systems. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. Primary outcomes included need for therapeutic endoscopic intervention and occurrence of re-bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.
Total of the 105 patients, 61 received intravenous PPI injection and 44 received oral PCAB prior to emergency endoscopy. To minimize selection bias, bleeding severity was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. During emergency endoscopy performed within 48 hours, ulcer bed status was classified according to the Forrest classification. The proportion of lesions graded IIa or higher was significantly lower in the PCAB group ( < 0.001), as was the frequency of therapeutic endoscopy intervention (odds ratio = 0.272, 95% confidence interval: 0.111-0.665, = 0.004). The frequency of re-bleeding events was statistically significantly higher in the PPI group (odds ratio = 0.141, 95% confidence interval: 0.024-0.844, = 0.032).
Pre-endoscopic PCAB administration is more effective than PPI injection for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and may reduce ulcer bleeding mortality.
使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)旨在将胃酸降低至治疗消化性溃疡出血所需的治疗水平仍存在一些局限性。
比较在消化性溃疡出血内镜治疗前静脉注射PPI和口服钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(PCAB)的效果。
这项回顾性研究纳入了105例连续的非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者(于2023年8月至2024年2月接受治疗)。在急诊内镜检查前,患者接受静脉注射PPI(泮托拉唑80mg推注)或口服PCAB(替戈拉赞50mg单剂量)。使用格拉斯哥 - 布拉奇福德、罗卡尔和AIMS65评分系统评估出血严重程度。排除有严重合并症的患者。主要结局包括是否需要进行内镜治疗干预以及再出血的发生情况。进行多因素逻辑回归以调整潜在的混杂因素。
在这105例患者中,61例在急诊内镜检查前接受了静脉注射PPI,44例接受了口服PCAB。为尽量减少选择偏倚,使用格拉斯哥 - 布拉奇福德、罗卡尔和AIMS65评分评估出血严重程度,两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在48小时内进行的急诊内镜检查期间,根据福里斯特分类法对溃疡床状态进行分类。PCAB组中IIa级或更高分级病变的比例显著更低(<0.001),内镜治疗干预的频率也更低(优势比=0.272,95%置信区间:0.111 - 0.665,P = 0.004)。PPI组再出血事件的频率在统计学上显著更高(优势比=0.141,95%置信区间:0.024 - 0.844,P = 0.032)。
内镜检查前给予PCAB对上消化道出血比注射PPI更有效,并且可能降低溃疡出血死亡率。