Suleja Agata, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Cormio Angelo, Miszczyk Marcin, Shariat Shahrokh F
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Sep 1;35(5):549-553. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001310. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
This review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
A randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy alone in 125 MIBC patients demonstrated a significant improvement in 2-year local recurrence- free survival (LRFS) (96% vs. 69%; P < 0.01). Three studies have evaluated adjuvant RT alone. A single-arm study reported a 5-year local control rate of 79% among 72 patients, with 17% experiencing serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 122 patients found improved 3-year LRFS in the RT arm (81% vs. 71% at three years; P = 0.046), with low rate of severe GI AEs (3%); however, the survival difference was not statistically significant. Another RCT with 153 patients showed similar rates of acute severe AEs between RT and observation groups (1.6% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.34). Key limitations across studies include heterogeneity in design, lack of statistical power to detect survival differences, limited patient-reported outcome data, and absence of direct comparisons with immune checkpoint inhibitors - the current standard of care in the adjuvant setting.
Modern adjuvant RT appears to be associated with acceptable toxicity, likely due to improved delivery techniques. Although data suggest a benefit in local-regional control, an overall survival advantage has not been demonstrated. Adjuvant RT may be considered in selected high-risk patients, particularly in settings where access to salvage therapies or immunotherapy is limited.
本综述旨在综合关于根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后辅助放疗(RT)在肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)中作用的新证据。
一项对125例MIBC患者进行的将辅助放化疗与单纯化疗进行比较的随机试验显示,2年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)有显著改善(96%对69%;P<0.01)。三项研究评估了单纯辅助放疗。一项单臂研究报告72例患者中5年局部控制率为79%,17%发生严重胃肠道(GI)不良事件(AE)。一项涉及122例患者的随机对照试验(RCT)发现放疗组3年LRFS有所改善(三年时为81%对71%;P = 0.046),严重GI AE发生率低(3%);然而,生存差异无统计学意义。另一项有153例患者的RCT显示放疗组与观察组急性严重AE发生率相似(1.6%对4.2%;P = 0.34)。各研究的主要局限性包括设计的异质性、缺乏检测生存差异的统计效力、患者报告结局数据有限以及缺乏与免疫检查点抑制剂的直接比较——免疫检查点抑制剂是辅助治疗中的当前标准治疗方法。
现代辅助放疗似乎与可接受的毒性相关,可能是由于放疗技术的改进。尽管数据表明在局部区域控制方面有益,但尚未证明有总体生存优势。对于选定的高危患者,尤其是在挽救性治疗或免疫治疗可及性有限的情况下,可考虑辅助放疗。