Dvořák Z, Kubát M, Berkeš A, Pink R, Kubek T, Menoušek J
Acta Chir Plast. 2025;67(1):27-41. doi: 10.48095/ccachp202527.
Complex nasal defects most often arise due to oncological resection or severe trauma. Traditional methods of two-stage nose reconstruction using a forehead flap with a skin graft have often resulted in collapse and deformity of the nose with a very compromised outcome over time. These techniques were gradually replaced by new procedures consistently reconstructing the intranasal lining, most often with flaps from the nasal septum. These methods reconstruct the cartilaginous and bony support of the nose as well, while the skin cover of the nose is, nowadays, in large defects, reconstructed in three stages. Evaluation of the topic: The options for intranasal lining reconstruction are as follows: a composite graft, a turnover flap covered with a local flap, advancement of the residual lining (bipedicle vestibular mucosa flap), a folded forehead flap, a prelaminated forehead flap, the use of another local flap (a forehead, nasolabial, facial artery myomucosal flap), a hinged turnover flap, a septal mucoperichondrial hinged flap, a composite septal chondromucosal pivot flap, a turbinate flap and microvascular free flaps (a radial forearm flap, a helix free flap, a kite flap, a dorsalis pedis free flap, a temporoparietal free flap, a postauricular free flap). Thanks to the abundant vascular supply of the face, the risk of ischemia and infection is mitigated, allowing most complex nasal defects to be reconstructed by using local flaps to restore all layers of the nose. Local tissues retain ideal quality, coloration, and texture, are reliable, and usually result in esthetically acceptable morbidity of the donor area. If the inner lining defect is extensive, it must be reconstructed by free microvascular tissue transfer. If other than intranasal flaps are used in the reconstruction of the internal lining, it is preferable to postpone the reconstruction of the supporting framework until the second stage while thinning the flaps used; otherwise, there is a high risk of obturation of the nasal airways.
The results of modern reconstruction dramatically improved after the introduction of three-stage nasal reconstruction and emphasizing the reconstruction of all layers of the nose. Therefore, a quality inner lining is the basis for the construction of the new nose.
复杂鼻缺损最常见于肿瘤切除或严重外伤后。传统的两阶段鼻重建方法,即使用带皮肤移植的额瓣,随着时间的推移,常常导致鼻塌陷和畸形,效果非常不理想。这些技术逐渐被新的手术方法所取代,新方法始终如一地重建鼻内黏膜,最常用的是鼻中隔瓣。这些方法还重建了鼻的软骨和骨支撑结构,而如今,对于大面积鼻皮肤缺损,分三个阶段进行重建。对该主题的评估:鼻内黏膜重建的选择如下:复合移植、覆盖局部皮瓣的翻转皮瓣、残余黏膜推进(双蒂前庭黏膜瓣)、折叠额瓣、预构额瓣、使用其他局部皮瓣(额瓣、鼻唇沟瓣、面动脉肌黏膜瓣)、铰链式翻转皮瓣、鼻中隔黏骨膜铰链瓣、复合鼻中隔软骨黏膜枢轴瓣、鼻甲瓣和微血管游离皮瓣(桡侧前臂皮瓣、耳轮游离皮瓣、风筝皮瓣、足背游离皮瓣、颞顶游离皮瓣、耳后游离皮瓣)。由于面部丰富的血供,缺血和感染的风险降低,使得大多数复杂鼻缺损能够通过使用局部皮瓣重建鼻的所有层次。局部组织保留了理想的质量、色泽和质地,可靠,并且通常导致供区美学上可接受的并发症。如果鼻内黏膜缺损广泛,必须通过游离微血管组织移植进行重建。如果在重建鼻内黏膜时使用了鼻内瓣以外的其他皮瓣,最好将支撑框架的重建推迟到第二阶段,同时将所用皮瓣变薄;否则,存在鼻气道闭塞的高风险。
在引入三阶段鼻重建并强调重建鼻的所有层次后,现代重建的效果显著改善。因此,优质的鼻内黏膜是构建新鼻的基础。