Williams Georgia, Alao Micheal, Brooks Alexander, Doherty Hannah M, Moynihan Patrick J, Moradigaravand Danesh, Banzhaf Manuel, de Cogan Felicity, Bryant Jack A
Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
J Med Microbiol. 2025 Jun;74(6). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.002025.
Bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance are significant threats to global public health, both of which spread through contamination of solid surfaces. We have previously developed an antimicrobial surface technology that directly bonds the broad-spectrum biocide chlorhexidine to steel surfaces. These surfaces were shown to kill bacteria within minutes of contact and to be effective against bacteria evolved in the laboratory for resistance to chlorhexidine in solution. We hypothesized that resistance to these surfaces could exist outside of the naive and chlorhexidine-resistant laboratory strains tested previously. We also sought to test whether strains that were resistant to chlorhexidine in solution were also resistant to chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial surfaces. To test the efficacy of these surfaces against a range of bacteria isolated from the hospital environment and to compare this to the resistance of these bacteria to chlorhexidine in solution or when dissolved in solid media. Ninety-one isolates of mixed bacterial species were obtained from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. The isolates, along with laboratory strains of , and , were tested for sensitivity to chlorhexidine-coated steel surfaces in a 30-min exposure simulated splash assay. Resistance to chlorhexidine in solution was also assayed by solid and broth media MIC assays. We demonstrate that within 30 min of incubation, the surfaces reduced the survival of all 91 isolates. Over 85% of these isolates were killed (exhibiting a 7-8 log reduction compared with control surfaces), whilst 12% experienced a 3-4 log reduction. We also show that resistance to the surfaces did not correlate with resistance to freely diffusible chlorhexidine in liquid or solid media. The results demonstrate the efficacy of chlorhexidine-coated surfaces against a broad range of bacterial isolates from the hospital environment and imply the potential for a mode of exposure to dictate the effectiveness of different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Future studies should investigate the genetic mechanisms providing resistance to chlorhexidine-coated surfaces and whether these differ in the capacity to provide resistance to chlorhexidine in different modes of exposure.
细菌感染和抗菌药物耐药性是对全球公共卫生的重大威胁,二者均通过固体表面污染传播。我们之前开发了一种抗菌表面技术,可将广谱杀菌剂洗必泰直接结合到钢铁表面。这些表面在接触数分钟内即可杀死细菌,并且对在实验室中进化出对溶液中洗必泰耐药性的细菌也有效。我们推测,除了之前测试的未接触过洗必泰的实验室菌株和对洗必泰耐药的实验室菌株外,可能还存在对这些表面的耐药性。我们还试图测试对溶液中洗必泰耐药的菌株是否也对基于洗必泰的抗菌表面耐药。为了测试这些表面对从医院环境中分离出的一系列细菌的有效性,并将其与这些细菌对溶液中或溶解于固体培养基中的洗必泰的耐药性进行比较。从伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院获得了91株混合细菌菌株。将这些分离株与 、 和 的实验室菌株一起,在模拟飞溅试验中进行30分钟暴露,测试其对涂有洗必泰的钢铁表面的敏感性。还通过固体和肉汤培养基MIC试验测定对溶液中洗必泰的耐药性。我们证明,在孵育30分钟内,这些表面降低了所有91株分离株的存活率。超过85%的这些分离株被杀死(与对照表面相比,存活率降低7-8个对数),而12%的分离株存活率降低3-4个对数。我们还表明,对这些表面的耐药性与对液体或固体培养基中可自由扩散的洗必泰的耐药性无关。结果证明了涂有洗必泰的表面对医院环境中广泛的细菌分离株有效,并暗示暴露方式可能决定不同抗菌耐药机制的有效性。未来的研究应调查对涂有洗必泰的表面产生耐药性的遗传机制,以及这些机制在不同暴露方式下对洗必泰产生耐药性的能力是否不同。