Florică Ștefan, Lupulescu Alexandru, Dicu Tiberius, Tenter Ancuta, Dobrei Gabriel, Moldovan Mircea Claudiu, Burghele Bety, Hening Kinga, Pap Istvan, Grecu Şerban, Botoș Marius, Ciur Raluca, Sainz Carlos, Carpentieri Carmela, Di Carlo Christian, Cucoș Alexandra Laura
Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, "Constantin Cosma" Radon Laboratory (LiRaCC), "Babeş-Bolyai" University, Str. Fântânele 30, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, "Constantin Cosma" Radon Laboratory (LiRaCC), "Babeş-Bolyai" University, Str. Fântânele 30, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Aug 20;991:179962. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179962. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that has high carcinogenic potential and may constitute a significant public health problem. The long-term effectiveness of radon mitigation systems is often assumed, yet rarely questioned beyond initial implementation. This study investigates the long-term performance of mitigation systems after installation, based on continuous monitoring conducted over several years. Ten Romanian dwellings served as case studies illustrating the interaction between technical remediation measures and various patterns of occupant behaviour. The remediation methods included sub-slab depressurization (SSD), heat recovery ventilation, both centralized (CHRV) and decentralized (DHRV), and the use of radon barriers. The results showed a variable efficiency of the remediation methods, with average radon concentration reduction values ranging from -8 % to 91 %, and an overall median of 59 %. The SSD-based remediation methods demonstrated superior performance and better stability over time, recording an average efficiency of 86 %, while the CHRV and DHRV systems showed much higher variability and a decline in efficiency over time. One of the most critical factors contributing to the success of the remediation was user behaviour, with intermittent use, disconnecting of systems, or lack of maintenance leading to increases in post-remediation radon concentration, in some cases even above pre-remediation levels. In contrast, the active involvement of the occupants, including constant monitoring and prompt reaction to malfunctions, ensured that low radon levels (below 50 Bq/m) were maintained. The findings suggest that maintaining low radon levels over time requires more than just technical interventions, highlighting the importance of a balanced interaction between automated systems and occupant engagement. These results highlight the need for public policies that combine engineering solutions with behavioural, educational, and ongoing support strategies to maintain the effectiveness of residential radon safeguards.
氡是一种天然存在的放射性气体,具有很高的致癌潜力,可能构成重大的公共卫生问题。人们常常假定氡减排系统具有长期有效性,但在初始实施之后却很少受到质疑。本研究基于数年的持续监测,调查了减排系统安装后的长期性能。十个罗马尼亚住宅作为案例研究,说明了技术补救措施与各种居住者行为模式之间的相互作用。补救方法包括板下减压(SSD)、集中式(CHRV)和分散式(DHRV)热回收通风以及使用氡屏障。结果显示,补救方法的效率各不相同,氡浓度平均降低值在-8%至91%之间,总体中位数为59%。基于SSD的补救方法表现出卓越的性能和随时间更好的稳定性,平均效率为86%,而CHRV和DHRV系统则表现出更高的变异性和随时间效率的下降。促成补救成功的最关键因素之一是用户行为,间歇性使用、系统断开连接或缺乏维护会导致补救后氡浓度升高,在某些情况下甚至高于补救前水平。相比之下,居住者的积极参与,包括持续监测和对故障的及时反应,确保了低氡水平(低于50 Bq/m³)得以维持。研究结果表明,随着时间推移维持低氡水平不仅需要技术干预,还凸显了自动化系统与居住者参与之间平衡互动的重要性。这些结果强调了公共政策的必要性,这些政策应将工程解决方案与行为、教育和持续支持策略相结合,以维持住宅氡防护措施的有效性。