Xacur-Trabulce Anaida, Casas-Fuentes Gessner, Ruiz-Vasconcelos Veronica, Reitz Marianne Marchini, Henry Sharon M, Scalea Thomas M, Ribeiro Marcelo A F
General Surgery Department, Hospital Angeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.
General Surgery Department, Hospital Municipal Dr. José de Carvalho Florence, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 25;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00625-3.
Tourniquets are crucial for controlling life-threatening hemorrhage and, therefore, in preventing avoidable deaths in both military and civilian settings. Its increased use since the launch of the Stop the Bleed campaign, however, has raised concerns regarding possible complications associated with its application, including limb ischemia and amputation. The objective of this study was to synthesize the existing evidence regarding complications associated with the use of tourniquets for extremity injuries and identify gaps in knowledge to guide future research on this topic.
A review of the literature between 2016 and 2024 was performed including open access retrospective studies, case series, clinical cases, and systematic reviews that addressed tourniquet use in a civilian or military setting in patients with extremity injuries, following the PRISMA-ScR 2018 checklist. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases were queried, identifying 1,398 articles on the use of extremity tourniquets in military and civilian contexts, focusing on complications. Of these, 1,343 articles were excluded due to duplication or irrelevance based on the title. From the 55 remaining, 37 were excluded after abstract review for not meeting inclusion criteria. Of the 18 full-text articles reviewed, 10 were excluded due to insufficient data, leaving 8 studies for detailed analysis.
Prolonged application in emergency situations may lead to severe complications, such as nerve injuries, post-tourniquet syndrome and thromboembolic event risks. Nerve palsy has been identified as the most prevalent complication associated with prolonged tourniquet use.
Improved training is essential to help providers accurately assess bleeding severity and apply appropriate interventions, reducing complications and enhancing outcomes. Future research opportunities should consider: (1) prospective interventional randomized controlled studies aiming to compare the use of tourniquets to different methods of hemorrhage control; (2) development and validation of easy-to-use scores predicting complications and the need of amputation in both civilian and military settings including upper and lower extremities, to better guide clinical decisions and future guidelines; (3) development of better ways to teach lay providers to recognize life threatening bleeding; and (4) development of guidelines for timing of tourniquet loosening, removal or conversion.
止血带对于控制危及生命的出血至关重要,因此,在军事和民用环境中都能预防可避免的死亡。然而,自“止血行动”发起以来,其使用频率增加,引发了人们对其应用可能产生的并发症的担忧,包括肢体缺血和截肢。本研究的目的是综合现有关于使用止血带治疗肢体损伤相关并发症的证据,并找出知识空白,以指导该主题的未来研究。
按照PRISMA-ScR 2018清单,对2016年至2024年间的文献进行综述,包括开放获取的回顾性研究、病例系列、临床病例以及涉及民用或军事环境中肢体损伤患者使用止血带情况的系统评价。查询了PubMed、ScienceDirect和Cochrane数据库,共识别出1398篇关于在军事和民用环境中使用肢体止血带的文章,重点关注并发症。其中,1343篇文章因标题重复或无关被排除。在剩余的55篇文章中,37篇在摘要审查后因不符合纳入标准被排除。在审查的18篇全文文章中,10篇因数据不足被排除,最终留下了8项研究进行详细分析。
在紧急情况下长时间使用可能导致严重并发症,如神经损伤、止血带后综合征和血栓栓塞事件风险。神经麻痹已被确定为与长时间使用止血带相关的最常见并发症。
加强培训对于帮助医护人员准确评估出血严重程度并采取适当干预措施、减少并发症和改善治疗效果至关重要。未来的研究机会应考虑:(1)前瞻性干预随机对照研究,旨在比较止血带与不同出血控制方法的使用;(2)开发并验证易于使用的评分系统,以预测民用和军事环境中包括上肢和下肢在内的并发症及截肢需求,从而更好地指导临床决策和未来指南制定;(3)开发更好的方法来教导非专业医护人员识别危及生命的出血情况;(4)制定止血带松开、移除或转换时机的指南。