Suppr超能文献

非胃肠道肿瘤患者CA19-9水平升高的比较研究:不同免疫分析方法的评估及潜在干扰因素分析

Comparative Study of Elevated CA19-9 Levels in Non-Gastrointestinal Tumors Patients: Evaluation of Different Immunoassay Methods and Analysis of Potential Interfering Factors.

作者信息

Liu Yangyang, Li Wenxuan, Tang Shaoxi, Wu Ruihao, Wang Yumin, Shao Fanggui

机构信息

Central Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 5;13(6):1386. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061386.

Abstract

: CA19-9 elevation in non-gastrointestinal tumor patients may be influenced by various non-tumor factors, which poses challenges for clinical diagnosis. This study aims to assess the consistency between initial elevated CA19-9 levels detected by the ARCHITECT/Alinity i system (Abbott Diagnostics) and subsequent retesting using the Elecsys CA19-9 assay (Roche Diagnostics) in 5372 non-gastrointestinal tumor patients, and to explore potential factors contributing to CA19-9 non-specific elevation. : Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses were used to assess the agreement between the two assays. Nonparametric Spearman and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to assess the correlation between CA19-9 and different clinical comorbidities/antigen concentration strata and to compare the categorization by age/disease, respectively. : Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analyses revealed that the CA19-9 test results from Abbott and Roche platforms show significant systematic bias and weak correlation, making the two methods not directly interchangeable. After excluding common confounders, the study focused on heterophilic antibodies (HAs) as target. Blood samples were treated with a commercial blocking agent demonstrated alignment with baseline Elecsys CA19-9 results but differed significantly from initial ARCHITECT/Alinity i measurements. Furthermore, non-specific CA19-9 elevation was also associated with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, pulmonary infections, breast nodules, uterine leiomyoma, and its incidence increased with age. : The study highlights the need to consider potential interferences and underlying disorders when results conflict with clinical diagnoses. Method-specific validation and comprehensive clinical correlation are crucial for accurate interpretation of CA19-9 levels to prevent misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate patient management.

摘要

非胃肠道肿瘤患者中CA19-9升高可能受多种非肿瘤因素影响,这给临床诊断带来挑战。本研究旨在评估5372例非胃肠道肿瘤患者中,ARCHITECT/Alinity i系统(雅培诊断)检测出的初始CA19-9水平升高与随后使用罗氏诊断的Elecsys CA19-9检测进行复测之间的一致性,并探讨导致CA19-9非特异性升高的潜在因素。采用Bland-Altman分析和Passing-Bablok分析评估两种检测方法之间的一致性。使用非参数Spearman检验和Pearson卡方检验分别评估CA19-9与不同临床合并症/抗原浓度分层之间的相关性以及按年龄/疾病进行的分类比较。Bland-Altman回归分析和Passing-Bablok回归分析显示,雅培和罗氏平台的CA19-9检测结果存在显著的系统偏差和弱相关性,这使得两种方法不能直接互换。在排除常见混杂因素后,研究将重点放在嗜异性抗体(HA)上。用一种商业封闭剂处理血样后,其结果与Elecsys CA19-9基线结果一致,但与初始ARCHITECT/Alinity i测量结果有显著差异。此外,CA19-9的非特异性升高还与糖尿病、肺部感染、乳腺结节、子宫肌瘤等合并症有关,且其发生率随年龄增加而升高。该研究强调,当结果与临床诊断冲突时,需要考虑潜在干扰和基础疾病。特定方法的验证和全面的临床相关性对于准确解读CA19-9水平以防止误诊和确保恰当的患者管理至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9753/12189598/271d6eb0d0de/biomedicines-13-01386-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验