• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延长血液透析的疗效及其与标准血液透析和在线血液透析滤过的比较。

Efficacy of Expanded Hemodialysis and Comparison with Standard Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration.

作者信息

Bratsiakou Adamantia, Papasotiriou Marios, Davoulou Panagiota, Georgopoulou Georgia Andriana, Papachristou Evangelos, Goumenos Dimitrios S

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 16;26(12):5747. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125747.

DOI:10.3390/ijms26125747
PMID:40565210
Abstract

Patients on standard hemodialysis (HD) show insufficient clearance of medium-molecular-weight uremic toxins, resulting in long-term complications. In this study we investigated the effectiveness of expanded HD (xHD) in the clearance of medium-molecular-weight uremic substances. This prospective study included patients on standard thrice-weekly HD. Participants were treated with xHD for 4 weeks, and the clearance of urea and β2-microglobulin was measured at the beginning and at the end of the study and compared with standard HD (sHD). Moreover, we investigated the clearance of Su-PAR, MCP-1, and activin, comparing sHD, xHD, and online hemodiafiltration (HDF). xHD had the same efficiency in the removal of low-molecular-weight substances compared to sHD but led to a significant decrease in β2-microglobulin levels from the first application of the method (sHD: from 36.9 ± 10.6 to 39.7 ± 18.9 mg/dL, = 0.595 vs. 1st xHD: from 40 (36.5, 41.8) to 11 (9.8, 13.2) mg/dL, = 0.008 vs. after 4 weeks on xHD: from 31.5 (28.5, 34.5) to 8.7 (8.2, 9.0) mg/dL, = 0.008). Moreover, pre-session β2-microglobulin levels significantly decreased after 4 weeks on xHD. Su-PAR, MCP-1, and activin during xHD were also significantly reduced. xHD leads to a significant and cumulative reduction in medium-molecular-weight uremic toxins compared to standard HD.

摘要

接受标准血液透析(HD)的患者对中分子尿毒症毒素的清除不足,会导致长期并发症。在本研究中,我们调查了延长血液透析(xHD)对清除中分子尿毒症物质的有效性。这项前瞻性研究纳入了每周进行三次标准HD的患者。参与者接受了4周的xHD治疗,并在研究开始和结束时测量尿素和β2-微球蛋白的清除率,并与标准HD(sHD)进行比较。此外,我们还比较了sHD、xHD和在线血液透析滤过(HDF)对可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(Su-PAR)、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)和激活素的清除情况。与sHD相比,xHD在清除低分子物质方面具有相同的效率,但从首次应用该方法开始,β2-微球蛋白水平就显著下降(sHD:从36.9±10.6降至39.7±18.9mg/dL,P = 0.595;vs. 首次xHD:从40(36.5,41.8)降至11(9.8,13.2)mg/dL,P = 0.008;vs. xHD治疗4周后:从31.5(28.5,34.5)降至8.7(8.2,9.0)mg/dL,P = 0.008)。此外,在接受xHD治疗4周后,透析前β2-微球蛋白水平也显著下降。xHD期间的Su-PAR、MCP-1和激活素也显著降低。与标准HD相比,xHD能显著且持续地降低中分子尿毒症毒素水平。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Expanded Hemodialysis and Comparison with Standard Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration.延长血液透析的疗效及其与标准血液透析和在线血液透析滤过的比较。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 16;26(12):5747. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125747.
2
Comparison of hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration for ESRD: systematic review.血液透析、血液滤过和无醋酸盐生物滤过治疗终末期肾病的比较:系统评价
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Mar;45(3):437-47. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.11.008.
3
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
4
Impact of convective clearance on intra-dialytic potassium removal in chronic dialysis patients.对流清除对慢性透析患者透析期间钾清除的影响。
Artif Organs. 2025 Feb;49(2):300-309. doi: 10.1111/aor.14883. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
A randomized trial comparing medium cut-off membrane dialyzers with online hemodiafiltration for uremic toxins clearance in hemodialysis patients.一项比较中截流膜透析器与在线血液透析滤过清除血液透析患者尿毒症毒素效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89197-5.
6
Revisiting the Middle Molecule Hypothesis of Uremic Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Beta 2 Microglobulin Population Kinetics and Large Scale Modeling of Hemodialysis Trials In Silico.重新审视尿毒症毒性的中分子假说:β2微球蛋白群体动力学的系统评价及血液透析试验的大规模计算机模拟
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0153157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153157. eCollection 2016.
7
A health economic evaluation of the multinational, randomized controlled CONVINCE trial: cost-utility of high-dose online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis.一项针对多国随机对照CONVINCE试验的卫生经济学评估:与高通量血液透析相比,高剂量在线血液透析滤过的成本效益
Kidney Int. 2025 Apr;107(4):728-739. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.12.018. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
8
Comparison of uremic toxin removal between expanded hemodialysis and high volume online hemodiafiltrations in different modes.不同模式下扩展血液透析与高容量在线血液透析滤过清除尿毒症毒素的比较。
Acta Biochim Pol. 2024 Nov 29;71:13715. doi: 10.3389/abp.2024.13715. eCollection 2024.
9
The protective effect of different dialysis types on residual renal function in patients with maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同透析类型对维持性血液透析患者残余肾功能的保护作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12325. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012325.
10
Comparing Clearances of Polymethylmethacrylate and Polysulfone Dialyzer Membranes for Postdilution Hemodiafiltration in Patients With Kidney Failure: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和聚砜透析器膜在肾衰竭患者后稀释血液透析滤过中的清除率:系统评价与Meta分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e71943. doi: 10.2196/71943.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure. Reply.血液滤过或血液透析对肾衰竭患者死亡率的影响。回复
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 16;389(20):e42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2311148.
2
Expanded hemodialysis: what's up, Doc?拓展性血液透析:怎么了,医生?
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Feb 20;16(7):1071-1080. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad033. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Efficacy and safety of expanded hemodialysis in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.延长血液透析在血液透析患者中的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):541-550. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2048855.
4
Comparative Effectiveness between Expanded Hemodialysis (Hemodialysis Using a Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer) and Mixed-Dilution Online Hemodiafiltration Using a High-Flux Dialyzer in Removing Middle-Molecule Uremic Toxins.扩展血液透析(使用中分子截留器的血液透析)与使用高通量透析器的混合稀释在线血液透析滤过在清除中分子尿毒症毒素方面的比较效果。
Blood Purif. 2022;51(11):923-931. doi: 10.1159/000521886. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Efficacy of medium cut-off dialyzers and comparison with high-flux dialyzers in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中通量透析器与高通量透析器在维持性血液透析患者中的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Apher Dial. 2022 Aug;26(4):756-768. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13755. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
6
Prediction of mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review.慢性肾病患者死亡率的预测:一项系统综述。
World J Nephrol. 2021 Jul 25;10(4):59-75. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v10.i4.59.
7
Classification of Uremic Toxins and Their Role in Kidney Failure.尿毒症毒素的分类及其在肾衰竭中的作用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Dec;16(12):1918-1928. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02660221. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Uremic Toxins and Frailty in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Molecular Insight.尿毒症毒素与慢性肾脏病患者的虚弱:分子视角
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 10;22(12):6270. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126270.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for Prevention of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections.系统评价和荟萃分析抗生素和抗菌封管液预防血液透析导管相关感染的效果。
ASAIO J. 2021 Oct 1;67(10):1079-1086. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001382.
10
Is Expanded Hemodialysis an Option to Online Hemodiafiltration for Small- and Middle-Sized Molecules Clearance?扩大血液透析是否是中小分子清除的在线血液透析滤过的一种选择?
Blood Purif. 2019;47(1-3):126-131. doi: 10.1159/000493910. Epub 2018 Oct 12.