Chasles Oskar Gerald, Kokot Klaudia, Fercho Justyna, Siemiński Mariusz, Szmuda Tomasz
Scientific Circle of Neurotraumatology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4176. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124176.
This study investigates the relationship between the time elapsed from decompressive craniectomy to cranioplasty and surgical complications in patients after traumatic brain injury. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for references using the PRISMA guidelines. The data were subjected to the first phase of screening, which required the studies to be published between 1990 and 2024, be written in English, and include patients who underwent cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy due to traumatic brain injury. The second phase of screening assessed whether the studies included at least 10 patients and compared their outcomes based on the time between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty. A subgroup analysis was performed for ultra-early cranioplasty patients. This meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving patients who underwent early ( = 666) and late cranioplasty (n = 1214) after decompressive craniectomy. All studies had a retrospective observational design. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of complications between the groups, although late cranioplasty had slightly elevated odds of developing hydrocephalus (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.55-4.99, = 0.36). Interesting results stemmed from a subgroup analysis of the ultra-early cohort; they included favoring the ultra-early group in the odds of overall complications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.08-2.56, = 0.38) and hygroma (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.15-1.37, = 0.16). Later cranioplasty had better outcomes in the category of seizure (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.75-3.28, = 0.24). Cranioplasty within 90 days, considered early, had no statistically significant differences in complication rates compared to late cranioplasty.
本研究调查了创伤性脑损伤患者减压性颅骨切除术后至颅骨修补术的时间间隔与手术并发症之间的关系。按照PRISMA指南,对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行了系统检索以查找参考文献。数据进行了第一阶段筛选,要求研究发表于1990年至2024年之间,用英文撰写,且纳入因创伤性脑损伤行减压性颅骨切除术后接受颅骨修补术的患者。第二阶段筛选评估研究是否纳入至少10例患者,并根据减压性颅骨切除术后至颅骨修补术的时间比较其结果。对超早期颅骨修补术患者进行了亚组分析。这项荟萃分析纳入了15项研究,涉及减压性颅骨切除术后接受早期颅骨修补术(n = 666)和晚期颅骨修补术(n = 1214)的患者。所有研究均采用回顾性观察设计。两组并发症的发生率无统计学显著差异,尽管晚期颅骨修补术发生脑积水的几率略有升高(比值比1.66,95%置信区间0.55 - 4.99,P = 0.36)。超早期队列的亚组分析得出了有趣的结果;包括在总体并发症几率(比值比0.46,95%置信区间0.08 - 2.56,P = 0.38)和脑脊膜膨出(比值比0.45,95%置信区间0.15 - 1.37, P = 0.16)方面超早期组更具优势。晚期颅骨修补术在癫痫发作方面有更好的结果(比值比1.56,95%置信区间0.75 - 3.28,P = 0.24)。90天内的颅骨修补术被视为早期,与晚期颅骨修补术相比,并发症发生率无统计学显著差异。