Ramírez-Giraldo Camilo, Bimbo Chiara, Fabbri Nicolò, Bertasi Mario, Feo Carlo, Pesce Antonio
Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11867-2.
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the gold standard for managing acute cholecystitis. Intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising technique to enhance surgical safety by improving visualization of biliary anatomy, reducing bile duct injuries, and decreasing the incidence of failed critical view of safety (CVS), thereby minimizing the need for bailout procedures. This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes, particularly the need for bailout procedures, between conventional (white-light) and ICG fluorescence-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.
A prospective cohort of patients undergoing ICG fluorescence-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 101, January 2023 - December 2024) was compared with a retrospective control group treated with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 84, January 2021 - December 2022) at the same institution. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was employed to minimize selection bias and confounding variables.
Patients in the fluorescence-guided group had a significantly lower rate of bailout procedures compared to the conventional group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in secondary outcomes, including operative time, length of hospital stay, reintervention rates, and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III). Binary logistic regression confirmed a significant reduction in the risk of bailout procedures with fluorescence guidance (OR = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.00-0.33), while no other covariates reached statistical significance.
Based on our findings, the use of ICG fluorescence was associated with a reduced need for bailout procedures. Further multicenter prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes.
早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术仍然是治疗急性胆囊炎的金标准。使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)的术中荧光胆管造影术已成为一种有前景的技术,可通过改善胆管解剖结构的可视化、减少胆管损伤以及降低安全关键视野(CVS)失败的发生率来提高手术安全性,从而最大限度地减少补救手术的需求。本研究旨在比较急性胆囊炎患者在传统(白光)和ICG荧光引导下的腹腔镜胆囊切除术之间的手术结果,特别是补救手术的需求。
将2023年1月至2024年12月接受ICG荧光引导下腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性队列患者(n = 101)与同一机构2021年1月至2022年12月接受传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性对照组患者(n = 84)进行比较。采用倾向得分匹配(1:1比例)以尽量减少选择偏倚和混杂变量。
与传统组相比,荧光引导组患者的补救手术率显著降低。两组在次要结果方面未观察到统计学显著差异,包括手术时间、住院时间、再次干预率和主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III级)。二元逻辑回归证实荧光引导可显著降低补救手术的风险(OR = 0.05;95% CI:0.00 - 0.33),而其他协变量均未达到统计学显著性。
根据我们的研究结果,使用ICG荧光与减少补救手术的需求相关。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些结果并评估长期结果。