Suppr超能文献

全球水氟化与龋齿预防:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Water Fluoridation and Dental Caries Prevention Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Nascimento C F D, Gindri L A D S, de Oliveira M N, Paranhos L R, Hugo F N

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

School of Dentistry, University Center-UNIFAE, São João da Boa Vista, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2025 Jun 26:23800844251342804. doi: 10.1177/23800844251342804.

Abstract

Fluoridation of community water supplies constitutes one of the most effective public health interventions for preventing dental caries. In recent years, questions have been raised about its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to systematically review and summarize the existing evidence on community water fluoridation (CWF) and dental caries in permanent and deciduous teeth. Five databases and 3 gray databases were searched for relevant studies. Paired reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed their methodological quality. Standard mean differences (SMDs) for dmf(s)/DMFT(S) (decayed, missing, and filled teeth/surface) and odds ratios (ORs) for caries prevalence were measured between exposure or not to CFW for deciduous and permanent teeth. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore whether the study design, continent, or decade of publication changed the point estimates. Seventy-four studies were included in the qualitative analysis: 57 cross-sectional, 13 before-and-after, and 4 cohort studies. Thirty-two studies provided sufficient data for meta-analyses. The overall SMD of DMFT and dmf in those exposed to CWF compared with unexposed were -0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.48 to -0.17, = 96%, < 0.01) and -0.30 (95% CI: -0.39 to -0.21, = 88%, < 0.01), respectively. The prevalence of caries was smaller in those exposed to CWF for both the permanent (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.63) and deciduous (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.76) dentitions. Study design, continent, or decade of publication satisfactorily explained the heterogeneity between studies. Communities where water was fluoridated experienced less caries and differences expressed in terms of SMD and prevalence (OR) where of high magnitude, both in children and in adults. The results of the meta-analyses revealed significant differences in caries experience and prevalence in favor of CWF, which represents an effective and comprehensive public health intervention for caries prevention, especially in the primary dentition.Knowledge Transfer Statement:Based on the published literature, the results of this study show that fluoridation of community water supplies is still an effective public health intervention to prevent dental caries, both in children and adults, despite the widespread availability of fluoride-containing dental products, especially toothpaste. This result adds to the existing evidence to support its incorporation into public oral health policies.

摘要

社区供水氟化是预防龋齿最有效的公共卫生干预措施之一。近年来,人们对其有效性和安全性提出了质疑。本研究旨在系统回顾和总结关于社区水氟化(CWF)与恒牙和乳牙龋齿的现有证据。检索了5个数据库和3个灰色数据库以查找相关研究。由两名评审员独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估其方法学质量。测量了暴露于或未暴露于CWF的乳牙和恒牙的dmf(s)/DMFT(S)(龋、失、补牙/面)的标准平均差(SMD)以及龋齿患病率的比值比(OR)。进行亚组分析以探讨研究设计、所在洲或发表年代是否改变点估计值。74项研究纳入定性分析:57项横断面研究、13项前后对照研究和4项队列研究。32项研究提供了足够的数据用于荟萃分析。暴露于CWF者与未暴露者相比,DMFT和dmf的总体SMD分别为-0.32(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.48至-0.17,I² = 96%,P < 0.01)和-0.30(95%CI:-0.39至-0.21,I² = 88%,P < 0.01)。无论是恒牙(OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.43至0.63)还是乳牙(OR = 0.60,95%CI:0.48至0.76),暴露于CWF者的龋齿患病率均较低。研究设计、所在洲或发表年代能够较好地解释研究之间的异质性。水进行了氟化的社区龋齿较少,无论是儿童还是成人,以SMD和患病率(OR)表示的差异都很大。荟萃分析结果显示,在龋齿经历和患病率方面存在显著差异,支持CWF,这代表了一种有效且全面的预防龋齿的公共卫生干预措施,尤其是对乳牙列。知识转移声明:基于已发表的文献,本研究结果表明,尽管含氟牙科产品尤其是牙膏广泛可得,但社区供水氟化仍然是预防儿童和成人龋齿的有效公共卫生干预措施。这一结果为支持将其纳入公共口腔卫生政策增添了现有证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验