Tran Nam-Anh, Lin Yi-Shu, Pechlivanoglou Petros, Ali Samina, Coyle Doug, Poonai Naveen, Heath Anna
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Jun 11;6(4):100191. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100191. eCollection 2025 Aug.
The use of procedural medications for anxiolysis during laceration repair in children can mitigate distress, facilitate procedures, and avoid physical restraint. However, the optimal medication for use in the pediatric emergency department is unclear. This study compares hospital length of stay (LOS) and costs for 4 different procedural medications for pediatric laceration repair from the perspective of the Canadian health care system.
We used an individual-level state-transition model to compare (i) intranasal midazolam (INM), (ii) inhaled nitrous oxide (NO), (iii) intranasal dexmedetomidine, and (iv) intravenous ketamine (IVK). Model inputs were informed by literature and expert consultations. LOS included time before, during, and after laceration repair, adjusting for adequacy of interventions and adverse events. Healthcare costs included personnel, equipment, and medication costs. We evaluated the drivers of model uncertainty using the TRansparent Uncertainty aSsessmenT (TRUST) tool and value of information analyses.
The estimated LOS for NO, INM, IVK, and intranasal dexmedetomidine were 78.34, 82.13, 103.37, and 114.55 minutes with the per-person estimated costs of $176.7, $122.79, $167.16, and $165.07, respectively. These results were limited by the low quality of available evidence for model inputs. The key parameters contributing to decision uncertainty were procedure time for NO and IVK, with an expected value of $5.31 and $0.44 per person, respectively.
INM had the lowest expected healthcare cost, whereas children receiving NO had the shortest expected LOS. Decision uncertainty was driven by the lack of relevant studies examining the length of procedure with NO and IVK use.
在儿童裂伤修复过程中使用程序性药物进行抗焦虑治疗可减轻痛苦、便于操作并避免身体约束。然而,儿科急诊科使用的最佳药物尚不清楚。本研究从加拿大医疗保健系统的角度比较了用于儿童裂伤修复的4种不同程序性药物的住院时间(LOS)和成本。
我们使用个体水平的状态转换模型来比较(i)鼻内咪达唑仑(INM)、(ii)吸入氧化亚氮(NO)、(iii)鼻内右美托咪定和(iv)静脉注射氯胺酮(IVK)。模型输入参考了文献和专家咨询意见。住院时间包括裂伤修复前、期间和之后的时间,并根据干预措施的充分性和不良事件进行调整。医疗保健成本包括人员、设备和药物成本。我们使用透明不确定性评估(TRUST)工具和信息价值分析来评估模型不确定性的驱动因素。
NO、INM、IVK和鼻内右美托咪定的估计住院时间分别为78.34、82.13、103.37和114.55分钟,每人估计成本分别为176.7美元、122.79美元、167.16美元和165.07美元。这些结果受到模型输入可用证据质量低的限制。导致决策不确定性的关键参数是NO和IVK的操作时间,每人的预期值分别为5.31美元和0.44美元。
INM的预期医疗保健成本最低,而接受NO治疗的儿童预期住院时间最短。决策不确定性是由缺乏关于使用NO和IVK时操作时间的相关研究驱动的。