Ketenciler Serkan, Ali Yeşiltaş Mehmet, Koyuncu Ahmet Ozan, Gursu Özgür, Sanisoğlu İlhan
Deparment of Cardiovascular Surgery, İstanbul Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Deparment of Cardiovascular Surgery, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Institute of Cardiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2025 Apr 30;33(2):176-184. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27100. eCollection 2025 Apr.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate one-year clinical follow-up of patients who underwent bilateral ovarian vein embolization using crossover maneuvers between the ovarian veins via unilateral puncture.
Between January 2017 and September 2022, a total of 34 women (mean age: 39.6±4.9 years; range, 26 to 52 years) who had pelvic venous disease and underwent bilateral embolization of ovarian veins with unilateral puncture and collateral crossover were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were followed at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively. Symptoms were evaluated using physical examination findings and Visual Analog Scale scores and the need for reintervention was assessed.
Of a total of 34 patients, 21 (61.8%) reported dysmenorrhea and 18 (53%) reported both dyspareunia and lower limb varices. There were no major complications during the procedure. The mean preoperative Visual Analog Scale score was 8.1±0.8, which decreased to 2.1±0.6 at 12 months. Reintervention was necessary for only one patient during one-year follow-up.
Although bilateral ovarian vein embolization with crossover to the contralateral side poses greater technical challenges than unilateral ovarian vein closure, it remains a viable technique with favorable outcomes and lower complication rates.
在本研究中,我们旨在评估通过单侧穿刺在卵巢静脉之间进行交叉操作对双侧卵巢静脉进行栓塞的患者的一年临床随访情况。
回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年9月期间34例患有盆腔静脉疾病并接受单侧穿刺及侧支交叉的双侧卵巢静脉栓塞术的女性患者(平均年龄:39.6±4.9岁;范围26至52岁)。术后1个月、6个月和12个月对患者进行随访。通过体格检查结果和视觉模拟评分评估症状,并评估再次干预的必要性。
34例患者中,21例(61.8%)报告有痛经,18例(53%)报告有性交困难和下肢静脉曲张。手术过程中无重大并发症。术前视觉模拟评分平均为8.1±0.8,12个月时降至2.1±0.6。在一年的随访期间,仅1例患者需要再次干预。
虽然双侧卵巢静脉栓塞并交叉至对侧比单侧卵巢静脉封闭带来更大的技术挑战,但它仍是一种可行的技术,具有良好的效果和较低的并发症发生率。