Douxfils Jonathan
Research Unit in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (URPC), NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
QUALIresearch, Qualiblood s.a, Liège, Belgium.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 12;16:1559162. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1559162. eCollection 2025.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with a significant societal and economic burden. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) increase VTE risk by 2- to 6-fold, resulting in approximately 22,925 cases annually in the European Economic Area (EEA). Despite the high associated healthcare costs, which may reach 2.5 billion EUR annually, current international guidelines, including those from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH), discourage routine thrombophilia screening prior to COC prescription, citing low cost-effectiveness, low prevalence of thrombophilia, and potential unintended consequences, such as reduced contraceptive use. Recent advancements in screening technology challenge these guidelines. The normalized Activated Protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) assay, a low-cost tool capable of detecting both inherited thrombophilia and acquired COC-induced activated protein C (APC) resistance, offers a promising strategy for targeted screening. Economic models estimate that implementing nAPCsr-based screening could prevent up to 13,500 VTE cases annually, leading to 1.5 billion EUR in annual healthcare savings. Additionally, nAPCsr-guided contraceptive counseling enables personalized decision-making, directing high-risk women toward safer contraceptive options, such as progestin-only pills or COCs containing natural estrogens (estradiol or estetrol), which present a lower thrombotic risk. This manuscript emphasizes the necessity of updating current prevention strategies by integrating innovative screening tools like the nAPCsr assay. By addressing both direct healthcare costs and indirect costs related to productivity loss and long-term complications, such a strategy could improve patient safety, reduce the financial burden on healthcare systems, and promote equitable access to safer contraceptive methods. Furthermore, targeted screening could alleviate the underrepresentation of high-risk women in current cost estimates and significantly mitigate the societal impact of COC-associated VTE. In light of these findings, reconsidering current policy recommendations appears essential to facilitate evidence-based, cost-effective prevention of COC-related thrombotic events, ultimately enhancing public health outcomes.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE),包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE),是全球发病和死亡的主要原因,给社会和经济带来了巨大负担。复方口服避孕药(COC)会使VTE风险增加2至6倍,在欧洲经济区(EEA)每年导致约22,925例病例。尽管相关医疗费用高昂,每年可能达到25亿欧元,但包括世界卫生组织(WHO)和性与生殖健康护理学院(FSRH)在内的现行国际指南,都不鼓励在开具COC处方前进行常规血栓ophilia筛查,理由是成本效益低、血栓ophilia患病率低以及可能产生意外后果,如减少避孕药具的使用。筛查技术的最新进展对这些指南提出了挑战。标准化活化蛋白C敏感性比值(nAPCsr)检测是一种低成本工具,能够检测遗传性血栓ophilia和获得性COC诱导的活化蛋白C(APC)抵抗,为靶向筛查提供了一种有前景的策略。经济模型估计,实施基于nAPCsr的筛查每年可预防多达13,500例VTE病例,每年可节省15亿欧元的医疗费用。此外,nAPCsr指导的避孕咨询能够实现个性化决策,引导高危女性选择更安全的避孕方法,如仅含孕激素的药丸或含有天然雌激素(雌二醇或雌三醇)的COC,这些方法的血栓形成风险较低。本手稿强调了通过整合nAPCsr检测等创新筛查工具来更新当前预防策略的必要性。通过解决与生产力损失和长期并发症相关的直接医疗费用和间接费用,这样的策略可以提高患者安全性,减轻医疗系统的经济负担,并促进公平获得更安全的避孕方法。此外,靶向筛查可以缓解当前成本估计中高危女性代表性不足的问题,并显著减轻COC相关VTE的社会影响。鉴于这些发现,重新考虑当前的政策建议对于促进基于证据的、具有成本效益的COC相关血栓形成事件的预防至关重要,最终改善公共卫生结果。