White Cassidy M, Tessier Katelyn M, Lockhart Darcy E, Koopmeiners Joseph S, Hatsukami Dorothy K, Donny Eric C, Denlinger-Apte Rachel L
Department of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Masonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf131.
This study evaluated whether e-liquid nicotine concentration and non-tobacco flavor availability affected very low nicotine content (VLNC) and normal nicotine content (NNC) cigarette purchasing within an online experimental tobacco marketplace (ETM).
Adults who smoked daily (n = 67) completed four study visits. At each visit, using a pre-allocated balance, participants completed successive ETM shopping trips to purchase a week's worth of cigarettes, e-cigarette e-liquid, and/or nicotine gum. In one trip, the only cigarettes available had VLNC. In others, both NNC and VLNC cigarettes were available, with the price of NNC cigarettes escalating across trips ($0.12 - $2.00 / cigarette) while VLNC cigarette price remained constant ($6.00 / pack). Across visits, e-liquid available in the ETM varied by nicotine concentration (50 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml) and flavor availability (multiple flavors, one tobacco flavor). We compared cigarette purchasing by a linear mixed model with a random effect for subject.
When the only cigarettes available had VLNC, participants purchased fewer cigarettes when multiple e-liquid flavors (vs. one tobacco flavor) were simultaneously available in the ETM (-8.55 cigarettes, 95% CI: -15.85, -1.25). The nicotine concentration of available e-liquid (50 vs. 25 mg/ml) did not significantly affect cigarette purchasing. NNC cigarette demand across escalating prices was similar regardless of e-liquid condition, except average maximum expenditure was lower when multiple e-liquid flavors were available (-$2.54, 95% CI: -$4.08, -$1.00).
Within an ETM where NNC cigarettes were unavailable, participants purchased fewer VLNC cigarettes when non-tobacco e-liquid flavors were available vs. only a tobacco flavor.
Access to a variety of non-tobacco (e.g., fruit, mint, and dessert) flavored e-liquids could moderate initial VLNC cigarette and nicotine e-liquid purchasing if a low nicotine product standard for cigarettes is implemented. Future studies should investigate how the nicotine concentration, the flavor variety, and risk perceptions of vaping products affects VLNC cigarette purchasing and use over time.
本研究评估了电子烟液尼古丁浓度和非烟草口味供应情况是否会影响在线实验性烟草市场(ETM)中极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)和正常尼古丁含量(NNC)香烟的购买情况。
每日吸烟的成年人(n = 67)完成了四次研究访问。每次访问时,参与者使用预先分配的余额,连续进行ETM购物之旅,购买一周量的香烟、电子烟液和/或尼古丁口香糖。在一次购物之旅中,仅有的香烟为VLNC香烟。在其他购物之旅中,NNC和VLNC香烟均有供应,NNC香烟的价格在各次购物之旅中逐渐上涨(每支香烟0.12美元至2.00美元),而VLNC香烟价格保持不变(每包6.00美元)。在各次访问中,ETM中提供的电子烟液因尼古丁浓度(50毫克/毫升、25毫克/毫升)和口味供应情况(多种口味、一种烟草口味)而有所不同。我们通过线性混合模型比较了参与者的香烟购买情况,并对受试者采用随机效应。
当仅有的香烟为VLNC香烟时,如果ETM中同时提供多种电子烟液口味(相对于一种烟草口味),参与者购买的香烟数量会减少(减少8.55支,95%置信区间:-15.85,-1.25)。可用电子烟液的尼古丁浓度(50毫克/毫升与25毫克/毫升)对香烟购买没有显著影响。无论电子烟液情况如何,随着价格上涨,NNC香烟的需求相似,但当有多种电子烟液口味时,平均最大支出较低(-2.54美元,95%置信区间:-4.08,-1.00)。
在没有NNC香烟的ETM中,当有非烟草电子烟液口味时,与仅有烟草口味相比,参与者购买的VLNC香烟较少。
如果实施香烟低尼古丁产品标准,获取多种非烟草(如水果、薄荷和甜点)口味的电子烟液可能会减缓最初对VLNC香烟和尼古丁电子烟液的购买。未来的研究应调查电子烟产品的尼古丁浓度、口味种类和风险认知如何随时间影响VLNC香烟的购买和使用。