Hanlon Vincent C T, Cagan Alex, Eves-van den Akker Sebastian
Crop Science Centre, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nat Genet. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02230-1.
Mutations are often thought of as untargeted and non-adaptive, but in rare cases, organisms perform programmed, targeted and adaptive rearrangements of their own DNA sequences. Notable examples include the somatic diversification of immunoglobulin genes, which is the foundation of the vertebrate immune system, and natural CRISPR spacer arrays in bacteria, which recognize and cleave foreign DNA. These systems, along with a dozen known analogs scattered across the tree of life, often underlie critical biological functions, particularly in host-pathogen conflicts. In this Review, we compare the mechanisms by which organisms edit their own genomes. We show that superficially dissimilar editing systems often rely on surprisingly similar genetic mechanisms, regardless of function or taxon. Finally, we argue that the recurrence of editing in host-pathogen conflicts and the bias to a handful of well-studied organisms strongly suggest that new editing systems will be found in understudied pathogens and their hosts.
突变通常被认为是无靶向性且非适应性的,但在极少数情况下,生物体能够对自身的DNA序列进行程序化、靶向性和适应性的重排。显著的例子包括免疫球蛋白基因的体细胞多样化,这是脊椎动物免疫系统的基础,以及细菌中的天然CRISPR间隔序列阵列,它能够识别并切割外源DNA。这些系统,连同散布在生命之树上的十几个已知类似物,常常是关键生物学功能的基础,尤其是在宿主与病原体的冲突中。在本综述中,我们比较了生物体编辑自身基因组的机制。我们发现,表面上不同的编辑系统往往依赖于惊人相似的遗传机制,而与功能或分类单元无关。最后,我们认为在宿主与病原体的冲突中编辑现象的反复出现以及对少数经过充分研究的生物体的偏向性,强烈表明在研究较少的病原体及其宿主中将会发现新的编辑系统。
Nat Genet. 2025-6-27
mSystems. 2025-6-18
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-9-25
2025-1
Nucleic Acids Res. 2025-1-7
Nature. 2024-10
Nat Commun. 2024-9-17
Nucleic Acids Res. 2024-8-27
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024-2-27
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023-12-20
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023-11-21