Iyer Gopa, Choi Woonyoung, Luo Bin, Carvalho Filipe, Hanlon Timothy, Reis Henning, Guercio Brendan J, Fong Megan, Mountain Jack, Feng Mingxiao, Regazzi Ashley M, McCart Linda, Wen Yujia, Al-Ahmadie Hikmat, Mouw Kent W, Van Allen Eliezer M, Bellmunt Joaquim, Dreicer Robert, Flaig Thomas W, Halabi Susan, McConkey David J, Rosenberg Jonathan E
Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul;9:e2400938. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00938. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
In urothelial carcinoma, prior studies have indicated that the basal/squamous molecular subtype and the presence of select DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations are associated with improved benefit from cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate these biomarkers in specimens from the phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90601 trial.
We performed whole-transcriptome sequencing (n = 188) and exon capture DNA sequencing (n = 208) on pretreatment tumors from the CALGB 90601 randomized trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic bladder cancer. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on tumors from 22 patients who exhibited rapid progression or durable response. Tumors were assigned to molecular subtypes using three different classifiers. Proportional hazards model was used to correlate molecular subtype with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adjusting for stratification factors and treatment arm (for PFS).
Patients with basal tumors had the shortest PFS and OS in the entire cohort. PFS was numerically longer in patients with basal tumors receiving bevacizumab. DDR gene alterations were not associated with improved outcomes. , a candidate predictive biomarker of chemosensitivity identified by WES, did not confer sensitivity to cisplatin or gemcitabine in functional studies.
Molecular subtype and DDR alterations did not correlate with improved outcomes in CALGB 90601. Possible explanations for these results include the small cohort size, lack of strong therapeutic effects of the treatments, genomic heterogeneity between profiled specimens and the metastatic lesions under treatment pressure, and differences in biology associated with different disease states (muscle-invasive metastatic disease).
在尿路上皮癌中,既往研究表明基底/鳞状分子亚型以及特定DNA损伤反应(DDR)基因改变的存在与基于顺铂的化疗疗效改善相关。我们试图在III期癌症与白血病B组(CALGB)90601试验的标本中评估这些生物标志物。
我们对CALGB 90601随机试验中初治转移性膀胱癌患者的预处理肿瘤进行了全转录组测序(n = 188)和外显子捕获DNA测序(n = 208),该试验比较了吉西他滨/顺铂联合贝伐单抗或安慰剂的疗效。对22例表现出快速进展或持久缓解的患者的肿瘤进行了全外显子测序(WES)。使用三种不同的分类器将肿瘤分为分子亚型。采用比例风险模型将分子亚型与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行关联,并对分层因素和治疗组(用于PFS)进行调整。
在整个队列中,基底型肿瘤患者的PFS和OS最短。接受贝伐单抗治疗的基底型肿瘤患者的PFS在数值上更长。DDR基因改变与改善的预后无关。在功能研究中,WES鉴定出的一种化疗敏感性候选预测生物标志物对顺铂或吉西他滨不具有敏感性。
在CALGB 90601中,分子亚型和DDR改变与改善的预后不相关。这些结果的可能解释包括队列规模小、治疗的治疗效果不强、分析标本与治疗压力下的转移病灶之间的基因组异质性,以及与不同疾病状态(肌肉浸润性转移性疾病)相关的生物学差异。