Suppr超能文献

英夫利昔单抗与硫唑嘌呤联合治疗对比英夫利昔单抗单药治疗在小儿克罗恩病中的内镜愈合情况及疗效持久性比较

Comparison of endoscopic healing and durability between combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine versus infliximab monotherapy in pediatric Crohn's disease.

作者信息

Kim Yoon Zi, Kim Eun Sil, Kwon Yiyoung, Kim Seon Young, Kim Hansol, Choe Yon Ho, Kim Mi Jin

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06445-4.

Abstract

This retrospective observational study evaluated the effectiveness of endoscopic healing (EH) and the durability of infliximab (IFX) in combination with azathioprine (AZA) versus IFX monotherapy in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). EH was assessed after 1 year of treatment, whereas IFX durability and associated risk factors were evaluated over an extended follow-up period. Data from 108 pediatric patients were analyzed by comparing the EH rates, IFX trough levels (TLs), antibody-to-IFX (ATIs), and IFX durability between the AZA combination therapy (combination therapy group) and IFX monotherapy (monotherapy group) groups. Of the 108 patients who received IFX therapy, 85 (78.7%) received AZA combination therapy, and 23 (21.3%) received IFX monotherapy. The combination therapy group demonstrated superior EH rates (78.6 vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), higher IFX TLs (4.6 µg/mL vs. 3.9 µg/mL, p = 0.016), lower ATI positivity (25.0% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.025), and prolonged IFX durability than the monotherapy group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that ATI positivity (hazard ratio [HR] 5.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-17.60, p = 0.006) and combination therapy with IFX and AZA (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.51, p = 0.004) were associated with IFX durability.

摘要

这项回顾性观察性研究评估了在克罗恩病(CD)患儿中,英夫利昔单抗(IFX)联合硫唑嘌呤(AZA)与IFX单药治疗相比,内镜愈合(EH)的有效性以及IFX的持久性。治疗1年后评估EH情况,而在延长的随访期内评估IFX的持久性及相关危险因素。通过比较AZA联合治疗组(联合治疗组)和IFX单药治疗组(单药治疗组)之间的EH率、IFX谷浓度(TLs)、抗IFX抗体(ATIs)以及IFX的持久性,对108例儿科患者的数据进行了分析。在接受IFX治疗的108例患者中,85例(78.7%)接受了AZA联合治疗,23例(21.3%)接受了IFX单药治疗。联合治疗组的EH率更高(78.6%对33.3%,p<0.001),IFX TLs更高(4.6μg/mL对3.9μg/mL,p = 0.016),ATI阳性率更低(25.0%对52.2%,p = 0.025),且IFX的持久性比单药治疗组长。多变量Cox比例风险回归分析显示,ATI阳性(风险比[HR] 5.33,95%置信区间[CI] 1.61 - 17.60,p = 0.006)以及IFX与AZA联合治疗(HR 0.13,95% CI 0.03 - 0.51,p = 0.004)与IFX的持久性相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验