Zhao Lijuan, Xiong Qi, Long Yaping, Hu Haiming, Dong Zhouhuan, Zhu Fengwei, Zhao Jun, Yang Bo, Guan Jingzhi
Senior Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, 4th West Ring Road 100, Fengtai district, 100039, Beijing, China.
Graduate School of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1136. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14524-y.
Chemoimmunotherapy is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aims to evaluate the survival outcomes and safety of chemoimmunotherapy in young patients with ES-SCLC.
Patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC from three centers and divided into two age groups: young (aged ≤ 45 years) and control (aged > 45 to ≤ 75 years) between January 2015 and December 2023. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety between the two age groups.
Of the whole 347 patients, 59 were in the young group, while 288 were in the control group. The young group exhibited poorer PFS (median, 4.67 vs. 5.40 months, p < 0.001) and OS (median, 13.7 vs. 14.4 months, p = 0.028) compared with the control group, particularly in the context of chemoimmunotherapy [PFS (median, 4.50 vs. 5.57 months; p = 0.002), OS (median, 13.20 vs. 15.33 months; p = 0.012), respectively]. Additionally, in the young group, chemoimmunotherapy showed similar PFS (median, 4.50 vs. 5.75 months; p = 0.501) and OS (median, 13.20 vs. 13.70 months; p = 0.508) compared to chemotherapy. Moreover, the young group had a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (30.51% vs. 11.46%, p < 0.001) and hematologic toxicity, including thrombocytopenia (25.42% vs. 14.24%, p = 0.033).
The young group had poorer survival outcomes and chemoimmunotherapy may not provide a survival benefit in young patients, as evidenced by similar PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy. Additionally, the young group also experienced a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and hematologic toxicity.
化疗免疫疗法是广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线治疗方法。本研究旨在评估化疗免疫疗法在年轻ES-SCLC患者中的生存结局和安全性。
2015年1月至2023年12月期间,来自三个中心的病理或细胞学确诊的ES-SCLC患者被分为两个年龄组:年轻组(年龄≤45岁)和对照组(年龄>45岁至≤75岁)。我们评估了两个年龄组之间的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
在全部347例患者中,年轻组有59例,对照组有288例。与对照组相比,年轻组的PFS(中位数分别为4.67个月和5.40个月,p<0.001)和OS(中位数分别为13.7个月和14.4个月,p=0.028)较差,尤其是在化疗免疫疗法的情况下[PFS(中位数分别为4.50个月和5.57个月;p=0.002),OS(中位数分别为13.20个月和15.33个月;p=0.012)]。此外,在年轻组中,化疗免疫疗法与化疗相比,PFS(中位数分别为4.50个月和5.75个月;p=0.501)和OS(中位数分别为13.20个月和13.70个月;p=0.508)相似。此外,年轻组免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的发生率较高(30.51%对11.46%,p<0.001)以及血液学毒性,包括血小板减少症(25.42%对14.24%,p=0.033)。
年轻组的生存结局较差,化疗免疫疗法可能不会给年轻患者带来生存益处,与化疗相比,PFS和OS相似即可证明。此外,年轻组免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)和血液学毒性的发生率也较高。