Suppr超能文献

无烟住院酒精及其他药物戒断服务出院后使用尼古丁电子烟戒烟:一项实用的双臂、单盲、平行组随机对照试验。

Nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation following discharge from smoke-free inpatient alcohol and other drug withdrawal services: a pragmatic two-arm, single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Bonevski Billie, Rich Jane, Lubman Dan I, Segan Catherine, Baker Amanda, Borland Ron, Oldmeadow Chris, Gartner Coral, Walker Natalie, Dunlop Adrian, Daglish Mark, Bullen Christopher, Bauld Linda, Jacka David, Garfield Joshua B B, McCrohan Rose, Guillaumier Ashleigh, Manning Victoria

机构信息

Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2025 Jul;10(7):e568-e577. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00101-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been shown to be effective for smoking cessation among general populations, but there is little evidence in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). We aimed to assess the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking abstinence in people with SUD following discharge from smoke-free inpatient withdrawal services.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic, two-arm, single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. The majority of this study took place in the community after the participants were discharged from inpatient stay. Adults who were tobacco smokers (motivated to quit; not using e-cigarettes) from five smoke-free inpatient withdrawal services in Australia were recruited and randomly assigned by computer using stratified block (1:1) to receive a 12-week supply of either e-cigarettes or combination nicotine replacement therapy (cNRT) with Quitline behavioural counselling on discharge. Participants were advised to use e-cigarettes as much or as often as necessary or desired and cNRT according to instructions. Researchers collecting outcome data were masked to treatment group. The primary outcome was 7 months continuous tobacco smoking abstinence as measured at 9 months after randomisation. The primary analysis was performed using an intention-to-treat approach, with sensitivity analyses following per-protocol, treatment adherence, and complete case analysis approaches. Serious adverse events were classified by a physician as non-serious or serious and causality assessed. We analysed serious adverse events by treatment group and calculated an incident rate ratio for each comparison. This trial is completed and is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001787178).

FINDINGS

Between Sept 29, 2020, and June 3, 2022, 363 participants were enrolled. Of 363 participants, 207 (57%) were men and 151 (42%) were women; 179 (49%) were randomly assigned to e-cigarettes and 184 (51%) to cNRT. At follow-up, 19 (11%) of 179 participants in the e-cigarette group reported 7 months' continuous abstinence, compared with 18 (10%) of 184 participants in the cNRT group, with no significant differences between groups (risk ratio 1·09; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·52-1·89). The probability of a positive risk difference was 60% and Bayes factor was 0·04, indicating little evidence of a treatment effect. 15 serious adverse events occurred in the e-cigarette group and 13 occurred in the cNRT group (incident rate ratio 1·18; 95% CrI 0·56-2·54, p=0·65). None were treatment-related.

INTERPRETATION

There was no evidence of a difference in cessation rates or adverse effects after 9 months of follow-up between participants given e-cigarettes or cNRT following discharge from inpatient SUD withdrawal services. Both treatments had approximately 10% smoking continuous abstinence rates among a population that is hard to treat and who have disproportionate tobacco-related morbidity and mortality.

FUNDING

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

摘要

背景

含尼古丁电子烟已被证明对普通人群戒烟有效,但在物质使用障碍(SUD)患者中证据较少。我们旨在评估电子烟对接受无烟住院脱瘾服务出院后的SUD患者戒烟的有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项实用的双臂、单盲、平行组随机对照试验。本研究大部分在参与者出院后在社区进行。招募了来自澳大利亚五个无烟住院脱瘾服务机构的成年吸烟者(有戒烟意愿;未使用电子烟),并通过计算机使用分层区组(1:1)随机分配,在出院时接受为期12周的电子烟供应或联合尼古丁替代疗法(cNRT)及戒烟热线行为咨询。建议参与者根据需要或意愿尽可能多地使用电子烟,并按照说明使用cNRT。收集结局数据的研究人员对治疗组情况不知情。主要结局是随机分组后9个月时测量的7个月持续戒烟情况。主要分析采用意向性分析方法,并按照符合方案分析、治疗依从性分析和完全病例分析方法进行敏感性分析。医生将严重不良事件分类为非严重或严重,并评估因果关系。我们按治疗组分析严重不良事件,并计算每次比较的发生率比。本试验已完成,并在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(ACTRN12619001787178)。

结果

在2020年9月29日至2022年6月3日期间,共招募了363名参与者。363名参与者中,207名(57%)为男性,151名(42%)为女性;179名(49%)被随机分配到电子烟组,184名(51%)被分配到cNRT组。随访时,电子烟组179名参与者中有19名(11%)报告持续戒烟7个月,cNRT组184名参与者中有18名(10%),两组之间无显著差异(风险比1.09;95%可信区间[CrI]0.52 - 1.89)。阳性风险差异的概率为60%,贝叶斯因子为0.04,表明几乎没有治疗效果的证据。电子烟组发生15起严重不良事件,cNRT组发生13起(发生率比1.18;95% CrI 0.56 - 2.54,p = 0.65)。均与治疗无关。

解读

对于接受住院SUD脱瘾服务出院后的参与者,随访9个月后,电子烟组和cNRT组在戒烟率或不良反应方面没有差异的证据。在这个难以治疗且烟草相关发病率和死亡率不成比例的人群中,两种治疗方法的持续戒烟率均约为10%。

资金来源

澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验