Suppr超能文献

三种不同刷毛设计的手动牙刷在去除牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of three manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs in terms of plaque removal and gingival inflammation: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mishal Ratna, Shrestha Ashish, Bhagat Tarakant, Agrawal Santosh Kumari

机构信息

Madan Bhandari Hospital and Trauma Center, Urlabari, Nepal.

Department of Public Health Dentistry, BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06423-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plaque is causative factor for gingivitis and periodontitis. Mechanical plaque removal is one of most commonly used method. Toothbrush has many modifications since decade. New bristles claim to remove more plaque and improve oral hygiene. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of three different bristle designed toothbrushes in terms of plaque removal and gingival inflammation.

METHODS

A concurrent parallel randomized clinical trial was done among 105 female undergraduate medical students in which both examiner and analyser were blinded throughout the study period. The population was divided into three groups A, B and C (1:1:1) according to computer generated random list and assigned three different toothbrushes Oral B pro health (Crisscross), Oral B shiny clean toothbrush (Zigzag), Oral B sensitive care (Flat), respectively. Along with the toothbrushes, a fluoridated toothpaste was also provided. At baseline proper oral hygiene instruction and brushing method was demonstrated. Baseline plaque and gingival ghbvindex score was assessed by using Silness J and Loe H (1964) and Loe H and Silness J (1963), respectively. The follow up data collections were done at 7,14 and 21 days. Friedman's test was used to assess the association of plaque and gingival scores in different follow up. Pairwise PI and GI score were recorded and intergroup comparison of plaque and gingival scores were calculated by using Kruskal Wallis test.

RESULT

There were 35 participants allotted in each group. When compared to overall plaque and gingival score, there were significant reduction in every follow up (p < 0.001). However, Zigzag tooth brush showed more reduction in plaque and gingival score; mean rank scores were 38.69 and 26.56, respectively but it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the three different toothbrushes were equally effective in plaque removal and reduction of gingival inflammation. The Zigzag toothbrush showed maximum reduction in plaque and gingival inflammation; however, the difference was not significant.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered in ANZCTR on 21/02/2025 with trial registration number ACTRN12625000213448.

摘要

背景

牙菌斑是牙龈炎和牙周炎的致病因素。机械清除牙菌斑是最常用的方法之一。几十年来牙刷有了许多改进。新型刷毛声称能清除更多牙菌斑并改善口腔卫生。目的是评估三种不同刷毛设计的牙刷在清除牙菌斑和减轻牙龈炎症方面的有效性。

方法

对105名本科女医学生进行了一项同期平行随机临床试验,在整个研究期间检查者和分析者均为盲态。根据计算机生成的随机列表将研究对象分为A、B、C三组(1:1:1),分别分配三种不同的牙刷:欧乐B专业健康型(十字交叉刷毛)、欧乐B闪亮清洁牙刷(之字形刷毛)、欧乐B敏感护理型(扁平刷毛)。除了牙刷外,还提供了含氟牙膏。在基线时演示了正确的口腔卫生指导和刷牙方法。分别使用Silness J和Loe H(1964年)以及Loe H和Silness J(1963年)的方法评估基线牙菌斑和牙龈ghbv指数评分。在第7、14和21天进行随访数据收集。使用Friedman检验评估不同随访中牙菌斑和牙龈评分的相关性。记录成对的菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈指数(GI)评分,并使用Kruskal Wallis检验计算组间牙菌斑和牙龈评分的比较。

结果

每组分配35名参与者。与总体牙菌斑和牙龈评分相比,每次随访时均有显著降低(p < 0.001)。然而,之字形牙刷在牙菌斑和牙龈评分方面的降低更多;平均秩次分数分别为38.69和26.56,但差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,三种不同的牙刷在清除牙菌斑和减轻牙龈炎症方面同样有效。之字形牙刷在牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的降低最大;然而,差异不显著。

临床试验注册

该研究于2025年2月21日在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心进行回顾性注册,试验注册号为ACTRN12625000213448。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5bd/12224694/bc1e596cf9e3/12903_2025_6423_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验