Bhargava Nisha, Hurwitz Martina, Levey Josephine, Bennett Lily, Aronovitz Joseph A, Schmidt Daniel R, Lischalk Jonathan W, Kaplan Irving D, Aghdam Nima
Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology Brigham and Women's Hospital at Boston, Weymouth MA USA.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 13;54:100993. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100993. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To evaluate the dosimetric and toxicity profiles of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, comparing cohorts with and without intraprostatic boost (IPB) to assess feasibility and safety of IPB, with particular attention to urethral and bladder dose and toxicity.
This retrospective cohort study analyzed 349 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2018 and 2023. Of these, 266 received SBRT with IPB, and 83 received SBRT without IPB. Patients were treated using a robotic SBRT platform with fiducial tracking. Dosimetric parameters for the urethra, including D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, including D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy, were evaluated. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using CTCAE criteria.
For the urethra, median values for D0.03cc, D0.3cc, and V40Gy, and for the bladder, median values D0.03cc, D5cc, D10cc, and V37Gy were compared and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Late urinary toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2.25 % of patients in the IPB group and 2.47 % in the no IPB group, with no grade 3 acute toxicities reported.
These findings support the use of SBRT using an IPB as a feasible and safe approach to achieve focal dose escalation to dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) without significantly increasing urethra or bladder dose or toxicity. Future research should focus on standardizing DIL contouring, exploring adaptive planning techniques to increase accuracy, and prospectively studying toxicity and quality of life in patients treated with IPB with SBRT.
评估立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于前列腺癌的剂量学和毒性特征,比较有和没有前列腺内追加剂量(IPB)的队列,以评估IPB的可行性和安全性,尤其关注尿道和膀胱剂量及毒性。
这项回顾性队列研究分析了2018年至2023年间接受治疗的349例局限性前列腺癌患者。其中,266例接受了有IPB的SBRT,83例接受了无IPB的SBRT。患者使用带有基准跟踪的机器人SBRT平台进行治疗。评估了尿道的剂量学参数,包括D0.03cc、D0.3cc和V40Gy,以及膀胱的剂量学参数,包括D0.03cc、D5cc、D10cc和V37Gy。使用CTCAE标准评估急性和晚期毒性。
对于尿道,比较了D0.03cc、D0.3cc和V40Gy的中位数,对于膀胱,比较了D0.03cc、D5cc、D10cc和V37Gy的中位数,两个队列之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。IPB组2.25%的患者发生3级或更高等级的晚期泌尿系统毒性,无IPB组为2.47%,未报告3级急性毒性。
这些发现支持使用带有IPB的SBRT作为一种可行且安全的方法,以实现对前列腺内主要病灶(DILs)的局部剂量递增,而不会显著增加尿道或膀胱的剂量或毒性。未来的研究应专注于标准化DIL轮廓勾画,探索自适应计划技术以提高准确性,并前瞻性研究接受IPB联合SBRT治疗的患者的毒性和生活质量。