Suppr超能文献

优化前列腺癌诊疗流程:改善三级医疗中心活检后的等待时间

Optimising prostate cancer pathways: Improving post-biopsy waiting times in a tertiary centre.

作者信息

Soroush Shayan, Lim Sean, Beniwal Prachi, Wei Gavin, Lu Ying, Lim Kylie Yen-Yi, Holden Kirsten, Harper Matt, Donnellan Scott, Ranasinghe Weranja

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences Monash University Australia.

Department of Urology Monash Health Australia.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 2;6(7):e70045. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70045. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a streamlined Prostate Cancer Care Pathway (PCCP) in reducing post-biopsy waiting times and improving patient satisfaction in a high-volume tertiary centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing prostate biopsies were prospectively followed through PCCP for one year and were retrospectively compared to 150 patients who were treated at our centre either immediately prior to PCCP implementation (2022) or during Covid-19 lockdowns (2020). Waiting times were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the modified PCa Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ-P).

RESULTS

A total of 398 patients were included. 248 patients went through PCCP, compared with 75 patients pre-PCCP implementation (2022) and 75 patients during the 2020 pandemic. The median time from biopsy to results post-PCCP was 15.0 days (IQR 13.0-19.0). This was significantly shorter than pre-PCCP introduction of 21.0 days (17.0-28.0) and during 2020 lockdowns, 18.0 days (14.0-21.0, p < 0.001). A total of 131 patients (52.8%) requiring treatment under PCCP were streamlined for multidisciplinary discussion following imaging at a median time of 38.0 (29.8-42.0) days and seen at Urology or Radiation Oncology Consultant clinic for treatment discussion at a median of 38.0 days (31.0-49.0), compared to 63.0 days (45.0-84.0) pre-PCCP (2022) and 52.0 days in 2020 (38.0-75.0, p < 0.001). A total of 176 PCCP patients (70.1%) participated in PCQ-P with 93.2% of participants reporting satisfaction with waiting time durations (n = 176).

CONCLUSION

PCCP implementation reduced waiting times in all post-biopsy care measures following significant Covid-19 delays in PCa care delivery. Streamlining resources using similar pathways can reduce waiting times in cancer care and other conditions to alleviate anxiety during healthcare system strain.

摘要

目的

评估简化的前列腺癌护理路径(PCCP)在一家大型三级中心减少活检后等待时间及提高患者满意度方面的有效性。

患者与方法

对接受前列腺活检的患者前瞻性地采用PCCP随访一年,并回顾性地与150例在PCCP实施前(2022年)或新冠疫情封锁期间(2020年)于本中心接受治疗的患者进行比较。使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较等待时间。采用改良的患者前列腺癌问卷(PCQ-P)评估患者满意度。

结果

共纳入398例患者。248例患者采用PCCP,相比之下,PCCP实施前(2022年)有75例患者,2020年疫情期间有75例患者。PCCP实施后从活检到获得结果的中位时间为15.0天(四分位间距13.0 - 19.0)。这显著短于PCCP实施前的21.0天(17.0 - 28.0)以及2020年封锁期间的18.0天(14.0 - 21.0,p < 0.001)。在PCCP下,共有131例(52.8%)需要治疗的患者在成像后经简化流程进行多学科讨论,中位时间为38.0(29.8 - 42.0)天,并在泌尿外科或放射肿瘤学顾问门诊接受治疗讨论,中位时间为38.0天(31.0 - 49.0),相比之下,PCCP实施前(2022年)为63.0天(45.0 - 84.0),2020年为52.0天(38.0 - 75.0,p < 0.001)。共有176例PCCP患者(70.1%)参与了PCQ-P,93.2%的参与者对等待时间表示满意(n = 176)。

结论

在前列腺癌护理交付因新冠疫情出现显著延误之后,实施PCCP缩短了所有活检后护理措施的等待时间。采用类似路径优化资源可减少癌症护理及其他病症的等待时间,以缓解医疗系统压力期间的焦虑情绪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8aa/12221808/718c1672ed9e/BCO2-6-e70045-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimising prostate cancer pathways: Improving post-biopsy waiting times in a tertiary centre.
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 2;6(7):e70045. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70045. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD003510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003510.pub3.
3
Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD003510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003510.pub2.
6
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
9
Evaluation of the ventricular assist device programme in the UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(48):1-119, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10480.
10
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 29;9(9):CD003968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub5.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Analysis of the financial impact and efficiency of the One Stop Prostate Clinic: A same day prostate cancer diagnostic clinic in the Australian public health system.
J Public Health Res. 2023 Jan 10;12(1):22799036221146882. doi: 10.1177/22799036221146882. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Exploring wait time variations in a prostate cancer patient pathway-A qualitative study.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Jul;37(4):2122-2134. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3454. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of men with prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2022 Aug;130(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/bju.15699. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on urology surgical waiting lists and waiting lists prioritization strategies in the Post-COVID-19 era.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Apr;45(3):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
7
The waiting time for prostate cancer treatment in Italy: analysis from the PROS-IT CNR Study.
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Feb;74(1):38-48. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03925-9. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
9
Waiting times for prostate cancer: A review.
J Public Health Res. 2020 Jun 4;9(1):1778. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1778.
10
Delays in prostate cancer care within a hospital network in Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Dec;89(12):1599-1604. doi: 10.1111/ans.15554. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验