Nie Wenjia, Zheng Liyun, Xia Yuting, Xiao Dongping, Zou Yun
Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Skin Diseases, Candidate Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Skin Diseases, JXHC Key Laboratory of Skin Infection and Immunity, The Affiliated Dermatology Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.
Department of Psychiatry, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Mental Hospital & Affiliated Mental Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330029, Jiangxi, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07577-3.
This study aims to explore the potential association between propranolol and cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) through real-world evidence. Reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database spanning from January 2014 to September 2024, identifying propranolol oral solution as the primary suspected (PS) drug, were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis employed four key metrics: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify positive signals of cardiovascular AEs potentially associated with propranolol oral solution. Among 7,518 AE reports where propranolol oral solution was the PS drug, 196 cardiovascular AEs were identified. Peripheral coldness (n = 131, ROR 85.58, PRR 84.11), cyanosis (n = 24, ROR 15.91, PRR 15.87), and pallor (n = 12, ROR 3.79, PRR 3.79) were potentially associated with propranolol oral solution use. However, no positive signals were observed for other cardiovascular AEs, such as hypotension, bradycardia, or arrhythmias. Apart from peripheral vascular changes, our analysis did not detect positive signals for severe cardiovascular AEs, suggesting a favorable cardiovascular safety profile, though FAERS limitations such as underreporting warrant cautious interpretation. To ensure safety, standardized use and monitoring remain crucial.
本研究旨在通过真实世界证据探索普萘洛尔与心血管不良事件(AE)之间的潜在关联。对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中2014年1月至2024年9月期间的报告进行了分析,将普萘洛尔口服溶液确定为主要怀疑(PS)药物。不成比例分析采用了四个关键指标:报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比值(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和多项目伽马-泊松收缩法(MGPS),以识别可能与普萘洛尔口服溶液相关的心血管AE的阳性信号。在7518份以普萘洛尔口服溶液为PS药物的AE报告中,识别出196例心血管AE。肢端发冷(n = 131,ROR 85.58,PRR 84.11)、发绀(n = 24,ROR 15.91,PRR 15.87)和苍白(n = 12,ROR 3.79,PRR 3.79)可能与普萘洛尔口服溶液的使用有关。然而,对于其他心血管AE,如低血压、心动过缓或心律失常,未观察到阳性信号。除了外周血管变化外,我们的分析未检测到严重心血管AE的阳性信号,这表明心血管安全性良好,尽管FAERS存在报告不足等局限性,需要谨慎解读。为确保安全,规范使用和监测仍然至关重要。