Eldemrdash Ayman Mohamady, Alazhary Mohamed A, Zaher Zaher Zaki, Hemaida Tarek S, Yahia Mohammed Essam, Hammad Soudy S
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2025 Jul 3;2025:7797828. doi: 10.1155/anrp/7797828. eCollection 2025.
Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is commonly used in maxillofacial trauma but carries a high risk of bleeding and airway complications, particularly with direct laryngoscopy (DL). Video laryngoscopy (VL) provides better glottic visualization and may reduce airway trauma. This study compares VL and DL for NTI in maxillofacial trauma patients, focusing on bleeding severity, intubation efficiency, and complications. This randomized controlled trial included 64 patients undergoing NTI for maxillofacial trauma, randomly assigned to VL or DL. The primary outcome was nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, assessed using Fromme's scale. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, intubation time, need for adjunctive maneuvers (Magill forceps and cervical spine extension), and intubation-related complications. All intubations were performed under general anesthesia following standardized airway preparation. VL resulted in significantly lower nasal and oropharyngeal bleeding severity, with no bleeding (score 0) observed in 43.8% of the VL patients versus 12.5% of the DL group (=0.005). VL also resulted in shorter intubation times (51.9 ± 7.9 s vs. 58.1 ± 8.7 s; =0.003). The need for adjunctive maneuvers was significantly lower in the VL group ( < 0.001), and severe complications such as fractured teeth or deep lip injuries occurred more frequently in the DL group (=0.02). The first-pass success rate was higher in the VL group (96.9%) than in the DL group (78.1%) though the difference was not statistically significant (=0.058). VL demonstrated superior intubation efficiency and reduced bleeding severity compared with DL in maxillofacial trauma patients. Given its safety advantages and reduced need for adjuncts, VL appears to be a preferable technique for NTI in maxillofacial trauma though further multicenter studies are ensured. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06386757.
鼻气管插管(NTI)常用于颌面创伤,但具有较高的出血和气道并发症风险,尤其是在直接喉镜检查(DL)时。视频喉镜检查(VL)能提供更好的声门视野,可能减少气道创伤。本研究比较了VL和DL在颌面创伤患者中进行NTI的效果,重点关注出血严重程度、插管效率和并发症。这项随机对照试验纳入了64例因颌面创伤接受NTI的患者,随机分为VL组或DL组。主要结局是使用弗罗梅量表评估的鼻腔和口咽出血严重程度。次要结局包括首次通过成功率、插管时间、辅助操作(麦吉尔钳和颈椎伸展)的需求以及插管相关并发症。所有插管均在全身麻醉下进行,并遵循标准化气道准备流程。VL组的鼻腔和口咽出血严重程度显著更低,43.8%的VL组患者未出现出血(评分为0),而DL组为12.5%(P = 0.005)。VL组的插管时间也更短(51.9±7.9秒对58.1±8.7秒;P = 0.003)。VL组辅助操作的需求显著更低(P < 0.001),DL组发生牙齿骨折或唇部深部损伤等严重并发症的频率更高(P = 0.02)。VL组的首次通过成功率(96.9%)高于DL组(78.1%),尽管差异无统计学意义(P = 0.058)。与DL相比,VL在颌面创伤患者中显示出更高的插管效率和更低的出血严重程度。鉴于其安全优势和辅助操作需求减少,VL似乎是颌面创伤NTI的更优技术,不过还需进一步开展多中心研究。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06386757。