Machado Carvalho Joao Victor, Meyer Jeremy, Ris Frederic, Durham André, Bornand Aurélie, Ricoeur Alexis, Corrò Claudia, Koessler Thibaud
Translational Research Center in Onco-Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Cancer Center Léman, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;17(13):2229. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132229.
Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) very often requires a neoadjuvant multimodal approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) encompasses treatments like chemoradiotherapy (CRT), short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), radiotherapy (RT) or a combination of either of these two with additional induction or consolidation chemotherapy, namely total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). In case of complete radiological and clinical response, the non-operative watch-and-wait strategy can be adopted in selected patients. This strategy is impacted by a regrowth rate of approximately 30%. Predicting biomarkers of tumor response to NAT could improve guidance of clinicians during clinical decision making, improving treatment outcomes and decreasing unnecessary treatment exposure. To this day, there is no validated biomarker to predict tumor response to any NAT strategies in clinical use. Most research focused on CRT neglects the study of other regimens. : We conducted a narrative literature review which aimed at summarizing the status of biomarkers predicting tumor response to NAT other than CRT in LARC. : Two hundred and fourteen articles were identified. After screening, twenty-one full-text articles were included. Statistically significant markers associated with improved tumor response pre-treatment were as follows: low circulating CEA levels; BCL-2 expression; high cellular expression of Ku70, MIB-1(Ki-67) and EGFR; low cellular expression of VEGF, hPEBP4 and nuclear β-catenin; the absence of TP53, SMAD4, KRAS and LRP1B mutations; the presence of the G-allel of LCS-6; and MRI features such as the conventional biexponential fitting pseudodiffusion (Dp) mean value and standard deviation (SD), the variable projection Dp mean value and lymph node characteristics (short axis, smooth contour, homogeneity and Zhang et al. radiomic score). In the interval post-treatment and before surgery, significant markers were as follows: a reduction in the median value of circulating free DNA, higher presence of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, lower presence of CTLA4+ or PD1+ regulatory T cells and standardized index of shape changes on MRI. : Responders to neoadjuvant SCRT and RT tended to have a tumor microenvironment with an immune-active phenotype, whereas responders to TNT tended to have a less active tumor profile. Although some biomarkers hold great promise, scarce publications, inconsistent results, low statistical power, and low reproducibility prevent them from reliably predicting tumor response following NAT.
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的治疗通常需要新辅助多模式方法。新辅助治疗(NAT)包括放化疗(CRT)、短程放疗(SCRT)、放疗(RT)或这两种治疗与额外诱导或巩固化疗的联合,即全新辅助治疗(TNT)。在影像学和临床完全缓解的情况下,可对选定患者采用非手术观察等待策略。该策略受约30%的复发率影响。预测肿瘤对NAT反应的生物标志物可改善临床医生在临床决策过程中的指导,提高治疗效果并减少不必要的治疗暴露。时至今日,尚无经过验证的生物标志物可预测临床应用中任何NAT策略的肿瘤反应。大多数聚焦于CRT的研究忽视了其他治疗方案的研究。我们进行了一项叙述性文献综述,旨在总结预测LARC中除CRT外肿瘤对NAT反应的生物标志物的现状。共确定了214篇文章。筛选后,纳入了21篇全文文章。与治疗前肿瘤反应改善相关的具有统计学意义的标志物如下:循环癌胚抗原(CEA)水平低;BCL-2表达;Ku70、MIB-1(Ki-67)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的高细胞表达;血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、人磷酸乙醇胺结合蛋白4(hPEBP4)和核β-连环蛋白的低细胞表达;TP53、SMAD4、KRAS和LRP1B突变缺失;LCS-6的G等位基因存在;以及磁共振成像(MRI)特征,如传统双指数拟合伪扩散(Dp)平均值和标准差(SD)、可变投影Dp平均值和淋巴结特征(短轴、轮廓光滑、均匀性和张等人的影像组学评分)。在治疗后至手术前的间隔期,具有统计学意义的标志物如下:循环游离DNA中位数降低、单核细胞来源的髓源性抑制细胞比例增加、细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA4)+或程序性死亡蛋白1(PD1)+调节性T细胞比例降低以及MRI上形状变化的标准化指数。新辅助SCRT和RT的反应者倾向于具有免疫活性表型的肿瘤微环境,而TNT的反应者倾向于具有活性较低的肿瘤特征。尽管一些生物标志物很有前景,但出版物稀少、结果不一致、统计效力低和可重复性低阻碍了它们可靠地预测NAT后的肿瘤反应。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-4-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-10-18
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-6-19
Sci Adv. 2024-1-26
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023-11
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023-11-15
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023-6
Eur J Pharmacol. 2023-6-15