• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊反搏泵(Impella)会增加急性心肌梗死患者的中风风险。

ECMO and impella increase stroke risk in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Wu Jing, Li Chenguang, Xu Zheng, Wang Baoguo, Zhang Mingyou

机构信息

Department of Translational Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10555-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-10555-4
PMID:40659731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12259963/
Abstract

There is limited data on the risk of stroke in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. Retrospective data were extracted from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2020, involving hospitalizations for AMI. The final cohort comprised: 4,370,069 hospitalizations with medical therapy only, 136,005 with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) only, 41,560 with Impella only, and 10,695 with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilized during hospitalization. The overall stroke rates for patients receiving medical therapy only, IABP only, Impella only, and ECMO were 3.39%, 3.56%, 4.54%, and 13.14%, respectively. Specifically, ischemic stroke rates were 2.93%, 3.17%, 3.96%, and 9.91%, and hemorrhagic stroke rates were 0.69%, 0.59%, 0.87%, and 4.77% for the respective groups. In stepwise forward Cox regression analysis, ECMO use was associated with the highest adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for overall stroke (aOR 3.04, 95% CI [2.66-3.48]), followed by Impella alone (aOR 1.79, 95% CI [1.61-2.00]) and atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.34, 95% CI [1.31-1.38]). However, IABP use showed no significant association with increased stroke risk in either univariate or multivariate analyses. While IABP use is not associated with an increased risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, ECMO and Impella use are linked to a higher stroke risk, particularly for ECMO-treated AMI.

摘要

关于使用临时机械循环支持装置治疗的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者发生中风风险的数据有限。回顾性数据取自2015年10月至2020年12月期间的美国国家住院样本,涉及AMI住院病例。最终队列包括:仅接受药物治疗的住院病例4370069例、仅使用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)的136005例、仅使用Impella的41560例以及住院期间使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的10695例。仅接受药物治疗、仅使用IABP、仅使用Impella和使用ECMO的患者总体中风发生率分别为3.39%、3.56%、4.54%和13.14%。具体而言,各相应组的缺血性中风发生率分别为2.93%、3.17%、3.96%和9.91%,出血性中风发生率分别为0.69%、0.59%、0.87%和4.77%。在逐步向前Cox回归分析中,使用ECMO与总体中风的最高调整后比值比(aOR)相关(aOR 3.04,95%置信区间[2.66 - 3.48]),其次是单独使用Impella(aOR 1.79,95%置信区间[1.61 - 2.00])和心房颤动(aOR 1.34,95%置信区间[1.31 - 1.38])。然而,在单变量或多变量分析中,使用IABP与中风风险增加均无显著关联。虽然使用IABP与缺血性或出血性中风风险增加无关,但使用ECMO和Impella与较高的中风风险相关,尤其是对于接受ECMO治疗的AMI患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/8a3d42b71044/41598_2025_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/d4d00fd34929/41598_2025_10555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/2b954531112a/41598_2025_10555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/8a3d42b71044/41598_2025_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/d4d00fd34929/41598_2025_10555_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/2b954531112a/41598_2025_10555_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac30/12259963/8a3d42b71044/41598_2025_10555_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
ECMO and impella increase stroke risk in acute myocardial infarction.体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊反搏泵(Impella)会增加急性心肌梗死患者的中风风险。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10555-4.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克中联合机械循环支持疗效与安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(3):650-661. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31369. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏术(IABP)用于治疗心肌梗死合并心源性休克。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 27;2015(3):CD007398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub3.
4
Predictors of Mortality in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Regardless of Early Left Ventricular Unloading: A National Experience.无论早期左心室卸载情况如何,静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合中死亡率的预测因素:一项全国性经验
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Apr;39(4):949-956. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.01.013. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮机械循环支持治疗心肌梗死后心源性休克:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Oct;38(10):1525-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏术(IABP)用于治疗心肌梗死并发心源性休克。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD007398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub2.
7
Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation (ECMO) for Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Impella 与体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗心源性休克的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jan;48(1):101427. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101427. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.机械循环支持治疗心原性休克患者的死亡率:网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02493-0.
9
Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.机械循环支持联合 Impella 或主动脉内球囊泵在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和/或心源性休克中的安全性和疗效:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):E636-E645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29236. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
10
Perioperative management of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: a comparison of Impella with intra-aortic balloon pump.心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的围手术期管理:Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏的比较
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02513-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Impella compared with intra-aortic balloon pump in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.在ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克中,Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏的疗效比较。
Am Heart J Plus. 2021 Nov 19;12:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100067. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.体外生命支持在与梗死相关的心原性休克中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 5;389(14):1286-1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307227. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
3
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or standard care in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the multicentre, randomised EURO SHOCK trial.
血管内-动脉体外膜肺氧合或标准治疗对合并急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的影响:多中心、随机 EURO SHOCK 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):482-492. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00204.
4
Management of Anticoagulation Therapy in ECMO-Associated Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage.体外膜肺氧合相关缺血性卒中与颅内出血的抗凝治疗管理。
Innovations (Phila). 2023 Jan-Feb;18(1):49-57. doi: 10.1177/15569845221141702. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
In-Hospital Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera: Insights From the National Inpatient Sample.伴原发性血小板增多症和真性红细胞增多症的急性心肌梗死患者的院内转归:来自全国住院患者样本的观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027352. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027352. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial.体外膜肺氧合治疗心源性休克:ECMO-CS随机临床试验结果
Circulation. 2023 Feb 7;147(6):454-464. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062949. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
7
Development and Validation of the Summary Elixhauser Comorbidity Score for Use With ICD-10-CM-Coded Data Among Older Adults.老年人 ICD-10-CM 编码数据中 Summary Elixhauser 合并症评分的制定与验证。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Oct;175(10):1423-1430. doi: 10.7326/M21-4204. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
8
Clinical Outcomes and Cost Associated With an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.临床结局和成本与血管内微轴左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):926-933. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2735.
9
Stroke patterns and cannulation strategy during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane support.动静脉体外膜肺氧合期间的卒中模式和插管策略。
J Artif Organs. 2022 Sep;25(3):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01300-5. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Strategy for reliable identification of ischaemic stroke, thrombolytics and thrombectomy in large administrative databases.利用大型行政数据库可靠识别缺血性脑卒中、溶栓和取栓的策略。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):194-200. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000533. Epub 2020 Nov 11.