Small G W
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;46(12):514-7.
Although the validity and reliability of the Ischemic Score (IS) have not yet been established, the IS has become a favored clinical and research tool for use in differentiating Alzheimer-type from multi-infarct dementia. In its current form, however, the IS has several shortcomings that interfere with standardization. To address these difficulties, the IS has been revised to include: anchoring statements to maximize interrater reliability; a multipoint subscale to allow for assessment of severity; and a confidence subscale to account for varied sources of data. The revised IS aims to stimulate additional research focused on validating and refining such instruments.
尽管缺血评分(IS)的有效性和可靠性尚未确立,但它已成为区分阿尔茨海默型痴呆和多梗死性痴呆的常用临床及研究工具。然而,以其目前的形式,缺血评分存在一些妨碍标准化的缺点。为解决这些难题,缺血评分已进行修订,纳入了:用于最大化评分者间可靠性的锚定陈述;用于评估严重程度的多点子量表;以及用于考虑不同数据来源的可信度子量表。修订后的缺血评分旨在推动更多聚焦于验证和完善此类工具的研究。