Suppr超能文献

评估激素避孕法的使用对贫血的影响:对46项人口与健康调查的横断面比较分析。

Estimating the effect of hormonal contraceptive use on anemia: A cross-sectional comparative analysis of 46 Demographic and Health Surveys.

作者信息

Chung Stephanie R, Spain Martina X, Hoppes Emily, Mackenzie Amelia

机构信息

Contraceptive Research, Development, and Introduction. Global Health and Population, FHI 360. Durham, United States of America.

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327083. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a significant health concern for women in low- and middle-income countries. Hormonal contraceptives, which can reduce heavy menstrual bleeding and prevent pregnancy and its resulting blood loss, are an underexplored opportunity for anemia reduction.

METHODS

Using Demographic and Health Survey data from 46 countries across four global regions, we examined country prevalence of anemia (i.e., hemoglobin below 12 g/dl via HemoCue testing) among women aged 15-49 years who were not pregnant. For each country, we used multivariable logistic regression to compare odds of anemia between women using hormonal contraceptive (users) to women using non-hormonal contraception or not using any contraception (nonusers). We merged data across countries to examine this effect stratified by contraceptive method and length of use and conducted a quantitative bias analysis of the anemia test.

RESULTS

Anemia prevalence ranged from 12% in Rwanda to 63% in Gabon. In the merged sample, the crude odds ratio comparing anemia in users of hormonal contraception to nonusers was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.58); the adjusted odds ratio was 0.55 (0.39-0.79) when controlling for age, education, wealth, and rurality. In the stratified analysis of merged data, we found that users of all hormonal contraception had lower adjusted odds of anemia compared to nonusers (AOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.46-0.57), and that the protective effect was strongest among users of contraceptive injections (AOR:0.37, 95% CI 0.30-0.45). In our bias analysis, the crude odds of anemia for users ranged from 0.29 to 0.57 when varying anemia test sensitivity and specificity between 75% and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should directly examine the causal link between hormonal contraceptive use and anemia as a high impact non-contraceptive benefit of hormonal contraception, especially with understudied methods such as injectable contraception and contraceptive implants.

摘要

背景

贫血是低收入和中等收入国家女性面临的重大健康问题。激素避孕药可以减少月经过多,并预防怀孕及其导致的失血,是减少贫血的一个尚未充分探索的机会。

方法

利用来自四个全球区域46个国家的人口与健康调查数据,我们调查了15 - 49岁未怀孕女性的贫血患病率(即通过血红蛋白仪检测血红蛋白低于12 g/dl)。对于每个国家,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来比较使用激素避孕药的女性(使用者)与使用非激素避孕药或未使用任何避孕药的女性(非使用者)患贫血的几率。我们合并了各国的数据,以按避孕方法和使用时长分层研究这种效应,并对贫血检测进行了定量偏差分析。

结果

贫血患病率从卢旺达的12%到加蓬的63%不等。在合并样本中,比较激素避孕药使用者与非使用者贫血情况的粗比值比为0.57(95%置信区间:0.56 - 0.58);在控制年龄、教育程度、财富和农村地区因素后,调整后的比值比为0.55(0.39 - 0.79)。在合并数据的分层分析中,我们发现所有激素避孕药使用者与非使用者相比,调整后的贫血几率更低(调整后的比值比:0.51,95%置信区间:0.46 - 0.57),并且这种保护作用在注射用避孕药使用者中最强(调整后的比值比:0.37,95%置信区间0.30 - 0.45)。在我们的偏差分析中,当贫血检测的敏感度和特异度在75%至100%之间变化时,使用者贫血的粗比值比在0.29至0.57之间。

结论

未来的研究应直接考察激素避孕药使用与贫血之间的因果联系,将其作为激素避孕药一项具有高影响力的非避孕益处,尤其是对于诸如注射用避孕药和避孕植入物等研究较少的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/846d/12266412/aeca364b4ab1/pone.0327083.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验