O' Connor Ciaran, Coyle Eddie, Mc Intyre Martin, Delahunt Eamonn, Thorborg Kristian
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University Shannon, Westmeath, Ireland.
Phys Ther Sport. 2025 Sep;75:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2025.07.004. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
To explore the effect of an isometric weighted Copenhagen adduction (WCA) exercise programme and an isometric unweighted Copenhagen adduction (CA) exercise programme on hip adduction strength, abduction strength and adduction:abduction strength ratio.
Randomized controlled trial, with flat outcome structure.
Rugby training facility.
Thirty-one male rugby players.
Between-group differences in hip adduction strength, abduction strength and adduction:abduction ratio were assessed using independent-sample t-tests. Within-group differences in hip strength were assessed using paired-sample t-tests.
15 participants were assigned to the CA group and sixteen to the WCA group. Post-intervention, a significant between-group difference in hip adduction:abduction strength ratio was observed (0.09 Nm/kg, p = 0.032) with large effect size (ES = 0.812). No significant between-group differences were evident for hip adduction strength (0.21 Nm/kg, p = 0.058) or hip abduction strength (0.01 Nm/kg, p = 0.856). The WCA group demonstrated significant increases in hip adduction (0.22 N/kg, +10 %, p = 0.008) and hip adduction:abduction ratio (0.06 N/kg, +7 %, p = 0.036), but not hip abduction (0.08 N/kg, +4 %, p = 0.055), following the 8-week programme. No significant changes in hip strength were observed in the CA group.
A low-dose 8-week adductor exercise programme using the isometric WCA exercise elicits significant increases in hip adduction:abduction strength ratio when compared to an isometric CA exercise.
探讨等长加权哥本哈根内收(WCA)训练计划和等长非加权哥本哈根内收(CA)训练计划对髋关节内收力量、外展力量以及内收与外展力量比值的影响。
具有扁平结局结构的随机对照试验。
橄榄球训练设施。
31名男性橄榄球运动员。
使用独立样本t检验评估组间髋关节内收力量、外展力量和内收与外展比值的差异。使用配对样本t检验评估组内髋关节力量的差异。
15名参与者被分配到CA组,16名被分配到WCA组。干预后,观察到组间髋关节内收与外展力量比值存在显著差异(0.09 Nm/kg,p = 0.032),效应量较大(ES = 0.812)。髋关节内收力量(0.21 Nm/kg,p = 0.058)或髋关节外展力量(0.01 Nm/kg,p = 0.856)组间无显著差异。经过8周的训练计划,WCA组髋关节内收力量(0.22 N/kg,增加10%,p = 0.008)和髋关节内收与外展比值(0.06 N/kg,增加7%,p = 0.036)显著增加,但髋关节外展力量(0.08 N/kg,增加4%,p = 0.055)未显著增加。CA组未观察到髋关节力量的显著变化。
与等长CA训练相比,使用等长WCA训练的低剂量8周内收肌训练计划可显著提高髋关节内收与外展力量比值。