Daou Elie E, Baba Nadim Z
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14082.
The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Schwickerath (ST) tests for the adherence of ceramic to cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) fabricated by different techniques, zirconia, and nickel chromium alloys.
Five different core/veneer combinations were prepared: Group SLM: selective laser melted Co-Cr; Group SM: soft milled Co-Cr; Group C: cast Co-Cr; Group Zi: soft milled zirconia; and Group Ni: cast nickel chromium, layered with ceramic. Disk-shaped specimens (diameter 15 mm, thickness 2 mm) with a ceramic thickness of 2 mm were prepared for SBS, and bars of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm with applied ceramic of 8 × 3 mm for ST (N = 100 and n = 20/group). Only half of the specimens from each group were thermocycled (5-55°C/5000 times). SBS test was applied to all the disks, and ST to the bars. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values, including shape (m) and scale (σ0), were calculated.
Thermal cycling had only a significant effect on SBS results for the SLM group (p = 0.017). A significant difference was found between testing techniques and materials (p < 0.001). The lowest value was reported for SLM in the SBS method (p < 0.001). Failure types were mostly mixed in SBS and adhesive in ST. The highest Weibull parameters were obtained for group C.
Both the testing methodology and the specimens manufacturing technique influenced the bond strength of ceramic to different alloys. The aging process influenced the results in the laser-sintered group in large specimens.
本研究的目的是比较通过不同技术制造的陶瓷与钴铬(Co-Cr)、氧化锆和镍铬合金之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和施维克勒拉特(ST)试验。
制备了五种不同的核/ veneer组合:SLM组:选择性激光熔化Co-Cr;SM组:软铣削Co-Cr;C组:铸造Co-Cr;Zi组:软铣削氧化锆;Ni组:铸造镍铬,覆有陶瓷。制备了直径15毫米、厚度2毫米且陶瓷厚度为2毫米的盘形试样用于SBS试验,以及尺寸为25×3×0.5毫米且施加陶瓷尺寸为8×3毫米的棒材用于ST试验(每组N = 100,n = 20)。每组仅一半的试样进行热循环(5-55°C/5000次)。对所有盘形试样进行SBS试验,对棒材进行ST试验。计算了包括形状(m)和尺度(σ0)的双参数威布尔分布值。
热循环仅对SLM组的SBS结果有显著影响(p = 0.017)。在测试技术和材料之间发现了显著差异(p < 0.001)。SBS方法中SLM组的值最低(p < 0.001)。SBS中的失效类型大多为混合失效,ST中的失效类型为粘结失效。C组获得了最高的威布尔参数。
测试方法和试样制造技术均影响陶瓷与不同合金之间的粘结强度。时效过程对大型试样中激光烧结组的结果有影响。