Suppr超能文献

在宫腔镜手术中,阿芬太尼与丙泊酚联合使用时抑制宫颈扩张反应的半数有效剂量(ED)和95%有效剂量(ED):一项前瞻性、双盲、剂量探索性临床研究。

The median Effective Dose (ED) and the 95% Effective Dose (ED) of alfentanil in inhibiting responses to cervical dilation when combined with ciprofol during hysteroscopic procedure: a prospective, double-blind, dose-finding clinical study.

作者信息

Gao Run, Li Shu-Xi, Zhou Yan-Hong, Xing Li, Fu Jin-Peng, Shen Jian-Jun, Chen Xin-Zhong, Xu Li-Li

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Anesthesia, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No.1 Xueshi Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310006, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03217-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alfentanil, a short-acting µ opioid receptor agonist, has recently been confirmed that when combined with propofol for daytime hysteroscopy, it provided more stable hemodynamics compared with sufentanil, and has a lower incidence of hypoxemia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The object of the trial was to determine the median effective dose (ED) and the 95% effective dose (ED) of alfentanil in inhibiting responses to cervical dilation when combined with ciprofol and explore the effect of alfentanil on reducing ciprofol requirement during hysteroscopy.

METHODS

One hundred and forty patients scheduled hysteroscopy under monitored anesthesia care were randomized to receive a bolus of 8 µg·kg, 10 µg·kg, 12 µg·kg, 14 µg·kg intravenous alfentanil or 0.15 µg⋅kg intravenous sufentanil followed by a bolus of 0.5 mg·kg ciprofol. Whether there was loss of response to cervical dilation or not in each patient was recorded. We used the probit analysis to determine ED and ED of alfentanil in inhibiting responses to cervical dilation when combined with ciprofol. The requirement of ciprofol, the emergence time, the visual analogue scale score of pain at five time points, and the incidence of adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The calculated ED and ED of alfentanil were 9.73 [95% CI 8.57 to 10.56] µg·kg and 15.02 [95% CI 13.57 to 18.12] µg·kg, respectively. Ciprofol requirements were lower in patients given 10 µg·kg (0.795 [ 0.707 to 0.889] mg·kg), 12 µg·kg (0.799 [0.601 to 0.913] mg·kg), and 14 µg·kg (0.789 [0.660 to 0.968] mg·kg) alfentanil than those given 8 µg·kg alfentanil (1.082 [ 0.853 to 1.271] mg·kg) alfentanil and 0.15 µg⋅kg sufentanil (1.046 [0.861 to 1.427] mg·kg) (P < 0.001). Emergence time was lower in patients given 10 µg·kg (0.9 [0.8 to 1.2] min), 12 µg·kg (0.8 [0.6 to 1.0] min) than those given 8 µg·kg (1.9 [1.0 to 2.8] min) and 14 µg·kg (1.5 [1.0 to 2.3] min) alfentanil, and 0.15 µg·kg sufentanil (1.4 [1.0 to 2.0] min) (P < 0.001). The visual analogue scale score of pain at the time of 30 min and 1 h after surgery was lower in patients given 10 µg·kg, 12 µg·kg, and 14 µg·kg alfentanil when compared with 8 µg·kg alfentanil and 0.15 µg⋅kg sufentanil (P < 0.001). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was lower in patients given 8 µg·kg, 10 µg·kg, 12 µg·kg alfentanil, and 14 µg·kg alfentanil than those given 0.15 µg·kg sufentanil (P = 0.044), while the incidence of intraoperative desaturation was higher in patients given 14 µg·kg alfentanil than those given 8 µg·kg, 10 µg·kg, and 12 µg·kg alfentanil, and 0.15 µg·kg sufentanil (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For women undergoing hysteroscopic surgery, a dose of 10-12 µg·kg of alfentanil was associated with significant ciprofol-sparing effect, earlier anesthesia emergence, better postoperative analgesia, and less unexpected hemodynamic events compared with sufentanil, but 14 µg·kg alfentanil had the risk of transient desaturation and delayed anesthesia recovery. Indications and the optimal dose of alfentanil in this patient population need further clarification.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was then registered on January 24, 2024 at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry which participates in the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Identifier: ChiCTR2400080232) before enrolling the first participant and written informed consent was obtained by each patient.

摘要

背景

阿芬太尼是一种短效μ阿片受体激动剂,最近已证实,与舒芬太尼相比,其与丙泊酚联合用于日间宫腔镜检查时,能提供更稳定的血流动力学,且低氧血症及术后恶心呕吐的发生率更低。本试验的目的是确定阿芬太尼与环丙泊酚联合使用时抑制宫颈扩张反应的半数有效剂量(ED)和95%有效剂量(ED),并探讨阿芬太尼对宫腔镜检查期间减少环丙泊酚需求量的影响。

方法

140例计划在麻醉监测下进行宫腔镜检查的患者被随机分为静脉注射8μg·kg、10μg·kg、12μg·kg、14μg·kg阿芬太尼或0.15μg·kg静脉注射舒芬太尼,随后静脉注射0.5mg·kg环丙泊酚。记录每位患者对宫颈扩张反应是否消失。我们使用概率分析来确定阿芬太尼与环丙泊酚联合使用时抑制宫颈扩张反应的ED和ED。记录环丙泊酚的需求量、苏醒时间、五个时间点的视觉模拟评分疼痛评分以及不良事件的发生率。

结果

计算得出阿芬太尼的ED和ED分别为9.73[95%CI 8.57至10.56]μg·kg和15.02[95%CI 13.57至18.12]μg·kg。给予10μg·kg(0.795[0.707至0.889]mg·kg)、12μg·kg(0.799[0.601至0.913]mg·kg)和14μg·kg(0.789[0.660至0.968]mg·kg)阿芬太尼的患者,其环丙泊酚需求量低于给予8μg·kg阿芬太尼(1.082[0.853至1.271]mg·kg)和0.15μg·kg舒芬太尼(1.046[0.861至1.427]mg·kg)的患者(P<0.001)。给予10μg·kg(0.9[0.8至1.2]分钟)、12μg·kg(0.8[0.6至1.0]分钟)阿芬太尼的患者苏醒时间低于给予8μg·kg(1.9[1.0至2.8]分钟)、14μg·kg(1.5[1.0至2.3]分钟)阿芬太尼和0.15μg·kg舒芬太尼(1.4[1.0至2.0]分钟)的患者(P<0.001)。与给予8μg·kg阿芬太尼和0.15μg·kg舒芬太尼相比,给予10μg·kg、12μg·kg和14μg·kg阿芬太尼的患者术后30分钟和1小时时的视觉模拟评分疼痛评分更低(P<0.001)。给予8μg·kg、10μg·kg、12μg·kg阿芬太尼和14μg·kg阿芬太尼的患者术中低血压发生率低于给予0.15μg·kg舒芬太尼的患者(P=0.044),而给予14μg·kg阿芬太尼的患者术中低氧饱和度发生率高于给予8μg·kg、10μg·kg、12μg·kg阿芬太尼和0.15μg·kg舒芬太尼的患者(P<0.001)。

结论

对于接受宫腔镜手术的女性,与舒芬太尼相比,10-12μg·kg剂量的阿芬太尼具有显著的环丙泊酚节省效应、更早的麻醉苏醒、更好的术后镇痛以及更少的意外血流动力学事件,但14μg·kg阿芬太尼有短暂低氧饱和度和麻醉恢复延迟的风险。该患者群体中阿芬太尼的适应证和最佳剂量需要进一步明确。

试验注册

该研究于2024年1月24日在中国临床试验注册中心注册,该中心参与世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(标识符:ChiCTR2400080232),在招募第一名参与者之前,并获得了每位患者的书面知情同意。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验