• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为抑郁症患者共同创建决策辅助工具——结合数据驱动预测与患者及临床医生的需求和观点:混合方法研究

Development of a Cocreated Decision Aid for Patients With Depression-Combining Data-Driven Prediction With Patients' and Clinicians' Needs and Perspectives: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Kan Kaying, Jörg Frederike, Wardenaar Klaas J, Blaauw Frank J, Brilman Maarten F, Visser Ellen, Raven Dennis, Meijnckens Dwayne, Buskens Erik, Cath Danielle C, Doornbos Bennard, Schoevers Robert A, Feenstra Talitha L

机构信息

University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Interdisciplinary Center for Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30001, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands, 31 5036161008, 31 655257786.

Department of Research, GGZ Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 21;17:e67170. doi: 10.2196/67170.

DOI:10.2196/67170
PMID:40690589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorders significantly impact the lives of individuals, with varied treatment responses necessitating personalized approaches. Shared decision-making (SDM) enhances patient-centered care by involving patients in treatment choices. To date, instruments facilitating SDM in depression treatment are limited, particularly those that incorporate personalized information alongside general patient data and in cocreation with patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study outlines the development of an instrument designed to provide patients with depression and their clinicians with (1) systematic information in a digital report regarding symptoms, medical history, situational factors, and potentially successful treatment strategies and (2) objective treatment information to guide decision-making.

METHODS

The study was co-led by researchers and patient representatives, ensuring that all decisions regarding the development of the instrument were made collaboratively. Data collection, analyses, and tool development occurred between 2017 and 2021 using a mixed methods approach. Qualitative research provided insight into the needs and preferences of end users. A scoping review summarized the available literature on identified predictors of treatment response. K-means cluster analysis was applied to suggest potentially successful treatment options based on the outcomes of similar patients in the past. These data were integrated into a digital report. Patient advocacy groups developed treatment option grids to provide objective information on evidence-based treatment options.

RESULTS

The Instrument for shared decision-making in depression (I-SHARED) was developed, incorporating individual characteristics and preferences. Qualitative analysis and the scoping review identified 4 categories of predictors of treatment response. The cluster analysis revealed 5 distinct clusters based on symptoms, functioning, and age. The cocreated I-SHARED report combined all findings and was integrated into an existing electronic health record system, ready for piloting, along with the treatment option grids.

CONCLUSIONS

The collaboratively developed I-SHARED tool, which facilitates informed and patient-centered treatment decisions, marks a significant advancement in personalized treatment and SDM for patients with major depressive disorders.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症严重影响个人生活,不同的治疗反应需要个性化的治疗方法。共同决策(SDM)通过让患者参与治疗选择来加强以患者为中心的护理。迄今为止,促进抑郁症治疗中共同决策的工具有限,特别是那些将个性化信息与一般患者数据相结合并与患者共同创建的工具。

目的

本研究概述了一种工具的开发,该工具旨在为抑郁症患者及其临床医生提供:(1)数字报告中的系统信息,包括症状、病史、情境因素和潜在成功的治疗策略;(2)客观的治疗信息以指导决策。

方法

该研究由研究人员和患者代表共同领导,确保关于该工具开发的所有决策都是共同做出的。2017年至2021年期间采用混合方法进行数据收集、分析和工具开发。定性研究深入了解了最终用户的需求和偏好。范围综述总结了关于已确定的治疗反应预测因素的现有文献。应用K均值聚类分析根据过去类似患者的结果提出潜在成功的治疗选择。这些数据被整合到一份数字报告中。患者倡导团体制定了治疗选择网格,以提供基于证据的治疗选择的客观信息。

结果

开发了抑郁症共同决策工具(I-SHARED),纳入了个体特征和偏好。定性分析和范围综述确定了4类治疗反应预测因素。聚类分析根据症状、功能和年龄揭示了5个不同的聚类。共同创建的I-SHARED报告结合了所有研究结果,并与治疗选择网格一起集成到现有的电子健康记录系统中,准备进行试点。

结论

共同开发的I-SHARED工具促进了明智的、以患者为中心的治疗决策,标志着重度抑郁症患者个性化治疗和共同决策方面的重大进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/41f816745572/jopm-v17-e67170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/e627ab90f31d/jopm-v17-e67170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/2580faf7a1d1/jopm-v17-e67170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/41f816745572/jopm-v17-e67170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/e627ab90f31d/jopm-v17-e67170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/2580faf7a1d1/jopm-v17-e67170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff6/12303231/41f816745572/jopm-v17-e67170-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Cocreated Decision Aid for Patients With Depression-Combining Data-Driven Prediction With Patients' and Clinicians' Needs and Perspectives: Mixed Methods Study.为抑郁症患者共同创建决策辅助工具——结合数据驱动预测与患者及临床医生的需求和观点:混合方法研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 21;17:e67170. doi: 10.2196/67170.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
7
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
2
Individualized antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: Novel evidence-informed decision support tool.个体化抗抑郁治疗在重性抑郁障碍患者中的应用:新型基于证据的决策支持工具。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Nov;68(11):807-814. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6811807.
3
Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
计算机化临床决策支持系统与护理质量的绝对改善:对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3216.
4
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on relevant treatment outcomes in depression: qualitative study.患者与临床医生对抑郁症相关治疗结果的看法:定性研究
BJPsych Open. 2020 May 4;6(3):e44. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.27.
5
Patient decision aids for antidepressant use in pregnancy: a pilot randomised controlled trial in the UK.孕期使用抗抑郁药的患者决策辅助工具:英国一项随机对照试验的试点研究
BJGP Open. 2019 Dec 10;3(4). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101666.
6
The decision tool unipolar depression (DTUD): a new measure to facilitate the early identification of patients with major depressive disorder in need of highly specialized care.单相抑郁决策工具(DTUD):一种新的衡量标准,有助于早期识别需要高度专业化治疗的重度抑郁症患者。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2165-9.
7
Healthcare Options for People Experiencing Depression (HOPE*D): the development and pilot testing of an encounter-based decision aid for use in primary care.抑郁症患者的医疗保健选择(HOPE*D):一种用于初级保健的基于诊疗的决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e025375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025375.
8
Design and methods of the 'monitoring outcomes of psychiatric pharmacotherapy' (MOPHAR) monitoring program - a study protocol.“精神科药物治疗监测结果”(MOPHAR)监测项目的设计与方法——一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3951-2.
9
Shared decision-making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring: results of a cluster randomised-controlled trial.使用常规结果监测进行精神卫生保健中的共同决策:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;54(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1589-8. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
10
Development of a Strategic Tool for Shared Decision-Making in the Use of Antidepressants among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus Group Study.开发一种用于指导伴有重性抑郁障碍的患者使用抗抑郁药的共享决策的策略工具:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):1402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071402.